225363 Evaluation strategies for community and academic partner CBPR capacity: Findings from the Alliance for Research in Chicagoland Communities

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 4:56 PM - 5:09 PM

Benjamin Rucker , Chinese Mutual Aid Association, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Maryann Mason, PhD , Children's Memorial Research Center/Northwestern University, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Marta Pereyra , Coalition of Limited English Speaking Elderly, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Darby Morhardt, MSW LSCW , Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Lucy Gomez , Logan Square Neighborhood Association, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Juana Ballesteros, RN BSN MPH , The Greater Humboldt Park Community of Wellness, Chicago, IL
Melissa A. Simon, MD, MPH , Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, ARCC Steering Committee Member, Chicago, IL
Christine Dunford, PhD , The Field Museum, ARCC External Evaluator, Chicago, IL
Josefina Serrato, BA , ARCC / Northwestern University, Community-Campus Coordinator, Chicago, IL
Jen Kauper-Brown, MPH , Northwestern University, ARCC Director, Chicago, IL
A key principle of community-based participatory research is co-learning and capacity building of partners. The mission of the CTSA-funded Alliance for Research in Chicagoland Communities (ARCC) is to grow equitable and collaborative partnerships between Chicago area communities and Northwestern University (NU) for research that leads to measureable improvement in community health. ARCC's Steering Committee (SC) includes community-based organizations (12) and NU faculty (5). Working with an external evaluator, the SC, an evaluation subgroup, and ARCC staff conducted a collaborative, formative, and iterative evaluation of SC members' capacity to engage in research/CBPR and to work together to achieve ARCC's mission. In 3 phases, the evaluation assessed progress toward three goals: 1. Increase CBPR awareness, interest, knowledge and skills of SC members; 2. Increase integration of CBPR principles and practice into SC member priorities and programs; and 3. Increase SC member capacity to guide and develop ARCC to achieve its mission. Methods included participant-observation, surveys, focus groups, and interviews. The major findings (as of phase 2) are: a) Relationships between people are the foundation of the work of the ARCC SC. b) Money, time and staff are essential to doing CBPR work and are often scarce for community organizations. Sustainability is a concern. c) CBPR needs to receive greater recognition by the academic research community and those who support the work of community organizations. Each has multiple implications, which will be discussed by SC members and staff, along with how the SC is making improvements based on the findings.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the ARCC design and implementation process for evaluating community and academic partner CBPR capacity. 2. Discuss ARCC evaluation findings and the partnership plans for making changes based on these findings.

Keywords: Community-Based Partnership, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the director for the Alliance for Research in Chicagoland Communities
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.