226614 A legal network analysis of state public health emergency preparedness and response systems

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM

Patricia Sweeney, JD, MPH, RN , Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Christopher Keane, ScD , Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Elizabeth Ferrell Bjerke, JD , University of Pittsburgh Center for Public Health Practice, Pittsburgh, PA
Jillian Wein, JD/MPH 2011 , Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Karen Marryshow, JD , Center for Public Health Practice, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Jessica Kanzler, BA , Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
The Public Health System (PHS) is an interdependent network of public and private agencies, institutions, and individuals. Each agent of this system however, is directed by and accountable to a set of laws that are unique to that organization's contribution to the PHS. Acknowledging that the real power of a system lies in the way the parts come together and become interconnected to fulfill a specific purpose, this study sought to identify the extent to which state PHS agents are directed by law to function as interconnected and efficient preparedness and response systems. To determine this, 10 states were selected for study based upon size, population, urban/rural mix, region of the country and prior public health emergency experience. Applying qualitative research methodology and traditional legal research tools, the laws directing the emergency preparedness and response activities of 27 PHS agents in each state were identified. The text of each statute was then coded as to the agent being directed, the action to be taken, the purpose of the action, the goal to be accomplished, the timeframe for completion, and the condition that triggered the action. Utilizing SPSS and UNICET software, network analyses of legal relationships were conducted. The analyses demonstrated remarkable variability in the preparedness and response direction legislators have given the various PHS agents, across and within states, particularly regarding the actions being ordered and the purposes for doing so. These gaps and inconsistencies in statutory direction indicate opportunities to improve preparedness and response capacity through comprehensive policy reform.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health

Learning Objectives:
1. Define the agents of a state public health emergency response system 2. Explain how qualitative research methodologies can be combined with traditional legal research to conduct novel methods of legal analysis. 3. Compare the legal infrastructure directing public health system emergency preparedness and response in different states. 4. Analyze gaps in public health system legal networks within and across states. 5. Formulate legislative and policy options to improve public health system emergency preparedness and response capacity.

Keywords: Public Health Legislation, Public Health Agency Roles

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I conceived of this research study, I conducted this research and analysis of the data. I am a faculty member in the department of health policy and management in the Unviersity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. I teach Public Health Law and Ethics and Emergency Preparedness Law and Ethics.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.