226637 Clients' experiences at their first family planning visit: Perceptions of service quality, satisfaction with services, and client-provider interaction and effects on outcomes

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 3:30 PM - 3:50 PM

Freya Sonenstein, PhD , Center for Adolescent Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Kathleen M. Cardona, DrPH , Center for Adolescent Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Nanlesta Pilgrim, MPH , Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Methods: New client perceptions of services were assessed in U.S. family planning clinics using a 2-part ACASI (Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview). Clinics were located in State A (n=361), State B (n=268) and State C (n=119). Eligible clients were age 18-35, able to become pregnant, but not currently pregnant/trying to become pregnant. ACASI Part A was completed prior to seeing the clinician; Part B was completed just before leaving the clinic. Clients were contacted for follow-up interviews at 7 months to assess outcomes, and de-identified billing data was collected from the baseline clinics to assess return to clinic and services received. Results: Using single-item measures, 64% of clients reported overall satisfaction with their visit, and 57% strongly agreed that they had received good quality care at their visit. Questions representing each of seven dimensions of family planning service quality were asked in the baseline survey; scales representing Clinician Patient Centeredness, Provider Attention to Patient Feelings, and Clinic Discomfort were created. The Clinic Discomfort and Patient Centeredness scales were among factors significant in predicting client-perceived quality of care and client satisfaction with care received at their initial visit. These predictors, plus BC method chosen, race, ethnicity and language spoken are expected to yield detailed information regarding the interplay of communication and service quality/satisfaction and how these relate to the outcomes of interest. Conclusions: Differences in Patient Centeredness and Clinic Discomfort play a role in client satisfaction and perceived service quality; all may impact client outcomes of interest at 7 months post-visit.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Assess and define the quality of services provided in Title X clinics. 2. Identify aspects of client-provider interaction which influence new client perceptions of service quality, and assess client satisfaction with the quality of services provided at their initial family planning visit. 3. Assess the effects of client-perceived service quality and satisfaction with services on client outcomes, including 1) initiation and correct and continuous use of contraceptive method(s); 2) prevention of unintended pregnancy; and 3) return to the family planning clinic as recommended. 4. Describe ways client-clinician interactions at an initial family planning clinic visit could be enhanced to improve client outcomes, which may differ by race/ethnicity, language spoken, and contraceptive method chosen by the client.

Keywords: Family Planning, Reproductive Health Research

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have extensive experience conducting research and evaluations in family planning/provision of reproductive health services.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 3340.0: Quality of care