227423 Factors impacting enrollment in a multi-site international feeding trial

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Manolo Mazariegos, MD , Institute for Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
Neelofar Sami, MBBS , The Agha Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
Edna Imenda , University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
Adrien Lokangaka, MD , Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Congo-Kinshasa
Ana Lucía Garcés, MD, MPH , IMSALUD / San Carlos University, Guatemala City, Guatemala
Norman Goco, MHS , Statistics and Epidemiology, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Mark Kindem, MS , Statistics and Epidemiology, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Linda L. Wright , Center for Research for Mothers and Children NICHD, NIH, Rockville, MD
Marion Koso-Thomas, MD, MPH , Center for Research for Mothers and Children, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, Rockville, MD
Jamie Westcott, MS , Pediatric Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
Nancy Krebs, MD, MS , Pediatric Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
Michael Hambidge, MD, ScD , Pediatric Nutrition, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
Background: Diverse communities, cultures and resources may influence recruitment and enrollment of participants for community based trials. An examination of enrollment into a community-based, complementary feeding study in four countries may help to better understand these factors.

Study design: An efficacy study of two complementary feeding regimens in 1200 6–18 month old infants was conducted in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guatemala, Pakistan and Zambia. Infants 3-4 months of age, that were primarily breastfed and whose mothers intended to continue breastfeeding to 12 months were eligible for participation. Formula feeding, known birth defect or neurological disorder, and being a sibling of a multiple birth were exclusion criteria. Eligibility, enrollment and refusal rates were summarized across sites. Results: A total of 2412 mothers were interviewed to screen infants for eligibility. 1732 (72%) infants were determined eligible. Rates of eligibility varied from 57% to 95%. Formula feeding was the primary reason for ineligibility (80%). Of those eligible, 1233 (71%) enrolled into the study. Participation was refused for 499 infants. The primary reasons included spousal disapproval (47%), lack of time (35%); lack of interest (20%), fear of blood draw (18%), disagreement with home visits (17%) and disapproval by other family member (7%).

Conclusions: Rates of eligibility in Zambia and DRC were high and those eligible almost uniformly agreed to enroll. Pakistan and Guatemala had lower eligibility and higher refusal rates. Spousal influence and study demands strongly affected refusal rates. These and other cross-cultural factors should be considered when planning similar interventions.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Evaluate the recruitment and refusal rates for a community based, multi-site infant nutrition trial in low resource settings. Compare the reasons for refusals to participate in for a community based, multi-site infant nutrition trial in low resource settings. Explain the findings that are valuable for planning community based, multi-site infant nutrition trial in low resource settings.

Keywords: Research, Nutrition

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I serve as the protocol manager overseeing all aspects of study design, field implementation, and analysis of this international, public health research.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.