227641 Chain restaurant nutrition labeling: An overview of implementation and evaluation in Seattle/King County

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Nadine L. Chan, PhD, MPH , Assessment, Policy Development, and Evaluation, Public Health - Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA
James Krieger, MD, MPH , Prevention, Public Health - Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA
Brian E. Saelens, PhD , Seattle Children's, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Barbara Bruemmer, RD, PhD , Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Molly McNees, PhD , Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA
Luiza Marinescu, MN , Assessment, policy development and evaluation unit, Public Health Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA
Eric Finkelstein, PhD, MHA , Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
Seattle/King County was among the first to implement a restaurant nutrition labeling (aka menu labeling) policy. There is momentum around the country to pass similar policies as one way to improve access to nutrition information so that consumers can make informed decisions about what to buy when eating out. The innovative policy may also be one strategy to help reduce obesity, a major public health issue, fueled in part by excessive caloric intake. Common concerns about such policies include the limited evidence of the impact on consumers and the potential negative impact on sales transactions. The impacts of such policies are only beginning to be understood. We present an overview of the nutrition labeling regulation in Seattle/King County and highlight how it differs from others, including the proposed national menu labeling policy. We also present an overview of our comprehensive evaluation for this natural experiment. Using econometric, qualitative and quantitative methods, our panel will describe findings on lessons learned from the passage and implementation of the King County policy as well as impacts on restaurant transactions, restaurant environments, menus offerings, customer purchases, calories purchased, and customer perceptions about the policy. We will briefly summarize results from our population-based telephone surveys and customer receipt studies and highlight key features of the nutrition labeling policy that are potentially most and least effective in changing customer awareness and use of restaurant nutrition labels.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Epidemiology
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Describe the highlights of nutrition labeling regulation in Seattle/King County and how it differs from NYC and the proposed national policy. Describe the quantitative and qualitative methods being used to evaluate the impact of the regulation. Identify key features of the nutrition labeling policy that are potentially most and least effective in changing customer awareness and use of restaurant nutrition labels.

Keywords: Nutrition, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the lead epidemiologist and project manager for the overall evaluation of the impact of the restaurant nutrition labeling policy in King County, WA.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.