228457 Continuity of Operations Planning: A Collaborative Affair

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Alina Dorian, PhD , Center for Public Health and Disasters, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Kimberley Shoaf, DrPH , Center for Public Health and Disasters, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Kerry Lamb, MPH , School of Public Health, UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters, Los Angeles, CA
Kimber Nelson, MPH , Community Health Sciences, UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters, Los Angeles, CA
Background: Health departments play a critical role in maintaining the health and well- being of their communities. Normal public health operations will be sufficient and uninterrupted during many disasters; however, for a larger scale event where many health department resources will be focused on response, a continuity of operations plan (COOP) is necessary to define the needs of those operations that cannot be interrupted for any length of time. The authors worked with several health departments to create a COOP Planning Instrument and planning guide that helps streamline the planning process. Method: The authors reviewed agency plans and planning documents of various health departments to identify critical information necessary to complete an effective COOP. The authors worked with the Hawaii Department of Health on their COOP and developed four main assessments for the instrument and planning guide. Results/Outcome: The COOP planning guide delineates the key COOP components and outlines the planning process, the planning instrument, and training/maintenance information. The primary assessments of the instrument are: 1) Uninterruptible Routine Functions (URFs), 2) staffing, 3) supplies, and 4) alternate facility locations. Conclusion: The COOP Planning Instrument and planning guide allow public health departments to effectively identify their uninterruptible functions, the minimal number and type of staff needed to perform the operations, and the essential equipment and supplies needed to continue functioning following a large-scale disaster. Health departments should consider utilizing this instrument and planning guide when developing their plans.

Learning Objectives:
1. Explain the difference between normal public health operations and continuity of operations. 2. Define Uninterruptible Routine Functions (URFs) 3. Identify the four main questions of the COOP Planning Instrument

Keywords: Disasters, Emergency

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Dr. Dorian is qualified to present because she is assistant director of the UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters (CPHD and her background is in health systems management with expertise in international disasters and complex emergencies, both natural and man-made. She oversees many of the programs at CPHD and helped develop the Continuity of Operations Planning Instrument and planning guide that is the topic of this presentation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.