229402 Putting CDC's Best Practices into practice

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM

Sarah Moreland-Russell, MPH , St Louis University School of Public Health, Center for Tobacco Policy Research, St Louis, MO
Laura Brossart , George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
Sarah Schell , George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Anneke Mohr , George Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Kendre Israel, MSW , George Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO
Megan Multack , George Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
Background In 2007, the CDC Office on Smoking and Health (CDC-OSH) released the update of the Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. This update presented an integrated structure and revised funding recommendations. It continues to be an important document for program managers; however, they requested more guidance on how interventions should be implemented for the state and community interventions Best Practices category. In response to this request, CDC-OSH partnered with the Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Washington University in St. Louis to develop a series of user guides for the state and community interventions category. The User Guide Series is comprised of the following guides: 1. Coalitions 2. Youth Engagement 3. Pricing Policies 4. Policy Advocacy 5. Health Equity Methods To identify topics and the most effective evidence-based methods, we performed an extensive literature review, and consulted topic-related experts and tobacco control program staff employing exemplary practices. Results The user guide series provides programs with specific guidance for determining where funding should be allocated within the Best Practices category. This series fills the information gap (e.g., how funding should be spent) between the Best Practices guidelines (e.g., how much funding programs need) and The Community Guide for Preventive Services (e.g., what programs are implementing).

Conclusion The user guides complement the Best Practices by translating the broad recommendations into practical and evidence-based strategies for state and community interventions. Other public health disciplines can also learn from the approaches highlighted in the guides to implement evidence-based and effective practices.

Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Advocacy for health and health education
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Demonstrate how the user guide series fits with the Best Practices and the Community Guide for Preventive Services guidelines; and 2. Identify ways to incorporate the user guides in their own planning process for identifying practical, evidence-based practices, policies, and programs.

Keywords: Evidence Based Practice, Tobacco Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the manager of this project and lead author of each of these guides.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 3059.0: Tobacco control