229714 “Safe in Chicago”: Using formative & process evaluation methods to pilot an HIV intervention in sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic settings

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM

Leah C. Neubauer, MA , Master of Public Health Program, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Jessica Velcoff, MS , Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Gary W. Harper, PhD, MPH , Master of Public Health Program, DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Catherine Christeller, MA , Executive Director, Chicago Woman's AIDS Project, Chicago, IL
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) clinics are ideal settings for delivering HIV prevention interventions because of the potential to reach high volumes of diverse and high-risk individuals at a “teachable moment.” The Chicago Women's AIDS Project, a grassroots non-profit organization, has worked for over a decade providing STI/HIV prevention in STI clinics to 15,000 clinic patients annually. Partnered with a local university, they developed “Safe in Chicago,” an adaptation of an evidence-based HIV prevention intervention designed for delivery in clinic waiting rooms, involving a DVD and group discussion. The intervention was delivered in three diverse-audience serving clinics in many of Chicago's low-income and underserved communities. Formative/process evaluations included over 1,300 participants. Feasibility/acceptability of three different intervention delivery conditions were assessed: 1) a standard city clinic orientation video (control), 2) an adaptation of an evidence-based DVD intervention (“Safe in the City”), and 3) “Safe in Chicago”, which includes the “Safe in the City” DVD + a facilitator-led discussion intervention. When developing and implementing health education programs, application of formative and process evaluation methods should occur at the earliest development stages – when opportunities for influence/modification are likely the greatest. The evaluation consisted of observations, key informant interviews, patient/clinic staff focus groups, facilitator self-evaluations, ongoing feedback loops among staff/evaluation team and weekly meetings. This approach helped to a) improve understanding of the multiple factors influencing program outcomes, b) ensure the program was designed to meet the diverse communities' needs and c) address the complex, multifaceted nature of communicating topics like STIs and HIV/AIDS.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the benefits/challenges of conducting STI/HIV prevention education programs in STI clinic settings. 2. Identify the core components of the “Safe in Chicago” intervention. 3. Explain the benefits of conducting a formative and process evaluations when piloting health education programs. 4. Describe the process of ongoing training and feedback with the Safe in Chicago facilitators.

Keywords: STD Prevention, Health Promotion

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified because I am the lead evaluator for the project
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.