231926
Strategies for assuring the civil rights of detained persons: U.S. and International Perspectives
Monday, November 8, 2010
: 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM
Robert Cohen, MD
,
National Commission on Correctional Health Care, APHA Representative, New York, NY
Andrew Fraser, MD, FFPH
,
Director of Health and Care, Scottish Prison Service, Edinburgh, Scotland
Margo Schlanger, JD
,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Officer fo Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Washington, DC
Susi Vassallo, MD, FACEP, FACMT, CCHP
,
Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
Persons detained by the state are at great, and sometimes, grave risk of harm which endangers their mental and physical health. This fact is universally recognized. It is enshrined locally in the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and operationalized in internal review systems, legislatively created oversight bodies, and access of prisoners to Court intervention. The Council of Europe engages this issue regionally through its Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and locally through National Inspectorates and national preventive mechanisms. The United Nations has adopted multiple conventions, including the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Optional Protocol, to protect detained persons throughout the world through encouraging the establishment of national preventive mechanisms and providing a system of international oversight. Social Justice demands that we learn from the victories and, more importantly, from our failures to protect prisoners of the state. Our panel will review the structure of these interventions in Europe and in the United States and critically evaluate successes and failures over the past twenty years. Panelists will discuss the challenges of federalism in the implementation of national preventive mechanisms and of effective self-policing within government and politics, and the enlargement of the role of advocacy.
Learning Areas:
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Learning Objectives: Detained persons are at high risk for sustained abuse of the civil rights. Participants in this session will be able to define,compare, and evaluate different national and internaitonal strategies for protecting these persons, including litigation, internal monitoring, regional external monitoring, and international monitoring.based upon the U.S. Constitution and International and Regional Human Rights Treaties.
Keywords: Human Rights, Jails and Prisons
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have directed the Rikers Island Health Services and am appointed by Federal Courts in NY, CT, and MI, OH, and FL to monitor medical care in prisons.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|