232518 Needlestick legislation makes an impact on hospital injury rates

Monday, November 8, 2010

Elayne Kornblatt Phillips, RN, MPH, PhD , International Health Care Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Mark R. Conaway, PhD , Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Ginger Parker, MBA , International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Jane L. Perry, MFA , International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Janine C. Jagger, MPH, PhD , International Health Care Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Background: Occupational injury and infection from contaminated sharp devices are the most deadly risk for healthcare workers. OSHA standards, dating back to 1991, required hospitals in the U.S. to institute engineering and work practice controls to minimize risk of bloodborne pathogen transmission. With passage of the 2000 Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, the standards were strengthened and made more specific regarding the requirement for employers to identify, evaluate and implement safety-engineered medical devices. This study systematically examines the impact of the law on hospital worker sharp injuries.

Methods: Using EPINet hospital surveillance data, which tracks sharps injuries among hospital workers in 85 hospitals throughout the U.S., we were able to observe changes in injuries from 1995-2004. AHA data were used to generate hospital-specific denominators (FTE, ADC, Beds) and track annual injury rates across the period prior to and following the legislative implementation.

Results: Comparing the slope of injury rates before the legislation and after, there was a significant (P<.001) decrease in slope beginning in the year 2000. The decrease varies between 45-50%, depending on the denominator. Not only was there a significant discontinuity in the pre- and post-slopes, but the rates continued to decrease in the post-legislation period.

Conclusions: These findings strongly support the conclusion that, even in the presence of OSHA regulations that pre-date the legislation, and even with a market of safety engineered devices available prior to the legislation, the legislation had an independent and powerful impact on the sharps injury experience of hospital workers in the U.S.

Learning Areas:
Occupational health and safety
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the implications of needlestick injury prevention legislation for the health of healthcare workers.

Keywords: Health Care Workers, Infectious Diseases

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to speak on this topic because I have been conducting NIOSH-funded research related to the impact of this legislation, and healthcare worker injuries and exposures to contaminated sharp devices.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.