233635
Preparing Ahead for Review, Promotion and Tenure Part II
Sunday, November 7, 2010
: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM
Sherril B. Gelmon, DrPH
,
Professor of Public Health, Mark O. Hatfield School of Government, Portland State University, Portland, OR
This section will focus on preparing a robust portfolio in preparation for the review, promotion and tenure process. A well-prepared faculty member can go a long way in making his or her "case" by providing strong context and solid documentation for the committee to consider. Documenting faculty work in the health professions requires faculty to pay close attention to their institution's general faculty guidelines and those that are specific to missions for which they are to demonstrate excellence. While there is a great deal of variability in faculty appointments in the health professions, there is a fairly uniform set of materials that faculty are expected to produce and organize for the promotion and tenure committee. The primary differences are in the areas of expertise that faculty are expected to emphasize and the specific criteria on which they will be assessed. In developing a faculty portfolio, it is important to take initiative in learning what the expectations are and what needs to be included. This session will demonstrate how and why to include community engagement in each section of the portfolio as an integral component of teaching, research and service and not as a separate category.
Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Advocacy for health and health education
Diversity and culture
Other professions or practice related to public health
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health
Learning Objectives: Explain ways to identify both academic and community mentors and get the most out of a mentor-mentee relationship.
Formulate a strategy for successfully navigating the promotion and tenure system.
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: As a community-engaged scholar who has successfully navigated my institution's promotion and tenure system, and has published articles that report on that experience in practical terms for my peers, I am qualified to present this content. I also contributed to the content that appears in the CCPH Community-Engaged Scholarship Toolkit that helps faculty to prepare strong portfolios for promotion and tenure. Further, through my work as evaluator for the CCPH Faculty for the Engaged Campus initiative, I have been gathering data from faculty and institutions across the country re: how they approach, document, and assess community-engaged scholarship in the faculty promotion and tenure process.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes
Name of Organization |
Clinical/Research Area |
Type of relationship |
Community Campus Partnerships for Health |
Program Evaluation |
Consultant, Speaker's bureau and teaching engagements and Travel has been paid in part by the Community Campus Partnerships for Health |
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|