233915 Economic analyses of two screening programs for ophthalmic conditions (amblyopia and macular degeneration): Process and impact in a UK context

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 12:47 PM - 1:01 PM

Jonathan Karnon, PhD , School of Population Health and Clinical Practice, Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Separate tenders for cost-effectiveness analyses of screening programs for amblyopia and strabismus (A&S), and for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were put out by the Health Technology Programme in the UK. This paper summarises the methods and results of the two evaluations, discusses potential approaches to interpreting and acting on the results, describes current routes by which the analyses could impact on policy and practice, and looks at new routes that could improve research translation (and hence, health service efficiency). Both analyses used a decision modelling framework to evaluate a range of alternative screening programs, which were calibrated and analysed probabilistically (‘probabilistic calibration'). In both cases, limited data were identified to populate the models, though the resulting uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness results can be differentially interpreted. The analyses were published as HTA monographs, though there is no explicit link between such analyses and decisions relating to policy and practice. A national screening committee provides guidance on issues relating to screening, which has a role with respect to the implementation nationally and locally co-ordinated screening programs. This paper charts the progression of the amblyopia and AMD screening analyses through the policy pathway is described, and assesses how the observed process could be improved.

Learning Areas:
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the impact of guidance provided by the national screening, at the th national and local level 2. Describe the potential informational gap between local and national decision makers

Keywords: Screening, Vision Care

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Jon Karnon, PhD, started work at the University of Adelaide in September 2007. He came from the Health Economics and Decision Analysis section at the University of Sheffield in the UK, where he had been based for over five years. Jon led a review of modeling methodologies for the evaluation of screening programmes, which led to three subsequent applied screening evaluations. He has also developed modeling methods for the evaluation of patient safety technologies. Karnon is currently developing a new modeling framework for the combined analysis of health service delivery, patient choice, equity and efficiency. This work aims to inform the efficient and equitable organisation and delivery of health care services.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.