237546 Improving quality of cause of death reporting in New York City hospitals

Monday, October 31, 2011

Vanessa Pratomo, MD , PH/Preventive Medicine Residency Program, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
Sayone Thihalolipavan, MD, MPH , PH/Preventive Medicine Residency Program, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
Ann Madsen, PhD , Office of Vital Statistics, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Gil Maduro, PhD , Office of Vital Statistics, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Elizabeth Begier, MD, MPH , Office of Vital Statistics, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Victoria Foster, MPH , Cardiovascular Disease Management, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY
Regina Zimmerman, PhD, MPH , Office of Vital Statistics, NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Objectives: Mortality statistics are used to determine and evaluate public health efforts. However, imprecise death certificate (DC) information results in unreliable statistics. Validation studies have found heart disease (HD) over-reporting throughout the US including New York City (NYC). We describe a within-hospital intervention that provides sustained improvement in cause of death (COD) reporting.

Methods: NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) intervened from July 2009 to January 2010 at 8 of the 12 hospitals with the highest proportion of HD deaths. These institutions were required to: 1) participate in a conference call, 2) provide a DC workflow protocol, 2) review medical records for 30 DCs with HD documented as the COD, 3) necessitate staff complete an online training, and 4) require staff attend a DOHMH in-service covering COD, legal requirements, and hospital-specific examples. Impact was assessed by measuring changes in the average proportion of HD deaths and number of conditions reported in intervention vs. non-intervention facilities from pre- (January–June 2009) to post-intervention (July–October 2010).

Results: The average proportion of HD deaths reported at intervention hospitals decreased from 0.68 to 0.35 (48.2% reduction; p<0.0001), while non-intervention hospitals were stable (0.26 to 0.24; p=0.071). The average number of conditions per DC increased from 2.3 to 3.3 (42.9%; p<0.0001) in intervention hospitals while non-intervention hospitals remained at 2.9 (p=0.583).

Conclusion: This multi-faceted, institution-level intervention provided sustained improvements in the quality of COD reporting at targeted hospitals. This intervention can help ensure accurate mortality data often used to drive policy, program, and resource allocation decisions.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Ethics, professional and legal requirements
Public health administration or related administration

Learning Objectives:
After this presentation, the participant will be able to: 1. Identify barriers to improving the quality of cause of death reporting 2. Describe and compare methods to improve the quality of cause of death reporting

Keywords: Quality Improvement, Data Collection

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am a physician who has been working with this Vital Statistics group for the past year and have presented this and similar content to NYC hospital staff involved in death certification.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.