240199 Communities with tobacco control policies are smarter communities: The correlation between tobacco control policies and educational indicators at state and local levels

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Christine Schilp, MEd, MPH , Epidemiology Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA
Shanta R. Dube, PhD, MPH , Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Michael A. Tynan , Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Annette McClave, MPH , Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
The association between smoking and education is well-established. Smoking among less educated individuals continues to remain high and increases health disparities. An ecological analysis was used to examine the relationship between tobacco control policies and educational outcomes. Cross-sectional data from 2006-2008 was accessed from the US Census Bureau (local educational attainment), CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (smoking prevalence; educational attainment), Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), and National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) (youth prevalence), National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (graduation rates), CDC's State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) system (excise taxes), and Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights' (ANR) (smoke-free laws). To test the statistical significance between tobacco control policies and educational outcomes, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used, controlling for poverty and smoking prevalence. Almost 4% more adults in states with comprehensive smoke-free laws had a bachelor's degree or higher compared to states with no smoke-free laws (36.7% v. 33.1%, p < 0.05). Among youth, the percentage of high school graduates was 4.3% higher among states with moderate cigarette taxes ($0.81-$1.60) compared to states with low cigarette taxes ($0.07-$0.80) (77.8% v. 73.5%, p < 0.05). Our data suggests an association between state-level tobacco control policies and educational attainment among adults and graduation rates among youth, regardless of smoking prevalence. Data on race/ethnicity and local-level estimates will also be presented. These findings suggest that tobacco control policies not only impact smoking rates, but are also linked with other indicators, including educational attainment.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related education
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Evaluate the correlation between increased cigarette taxes and comprehensive smoke-free laws with state high school graduation rates among youth, and educational attainment among adults. 2. Describe the education disparities among youth and adults that exist between states with higher excise taxes on cigarettes and states with lower excise taxes on cigarettes. 3. Compare the strength of the correlation between increased cigarette taxes and comprehensive smoke-free laws with educational outcomes.

Keywords: Education, Tobacco Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract Author on the content I am responsible for because I have been an ORISE Fellow for close to a year, working closely with Dr. Shanta Dube on tobacco use and education projects in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Office on Smoking and Health. I also have first-hand experience working as a middle school teacher, and understand the impact that various socio-ecological factors have on educational outcomes.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes

Name of Organization Clinical/Research Area Type of relationship
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health Epidemiology Branch, Surveillance Team ORISE Fellow

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.