240399
Informing breast and colon cancer screening narratives: Focus group findings from Project REEL
Tuesday, November 1, 2011: 5:10 PM
May G. Kennedy, PhD, MPH
,
Department of Social & Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Diane L. Bishop, MPH
,
Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Melissa Hayward
,
Department of Social and Behavioral Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Susannah Anderson, MPH
,
Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Sanaa Akbarali
,
Department of Social and Behavioral Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Background. African American women over 50 are screened for breast and colorectal cancer later in the progression of disease and die from these cancers at higher rates than women from other groups. Project REEL (Refining Entertainment Education for cancer screening Literacy) is testing several versions of an original, culturally tailored prevention soap opera embedded with screening promotion messages. The soap opera content was informed by focus groups. Method. Eight focus groups were held (N = 61). Separate groups discussed breast and colorectal cancer. Participants were “doers,” women who had been screened as per recommendations, and “non-doers,” women who were behind schedule. The facilitator's guide included questions relevant to: (1) Social Cognitive Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior, (2) character and scenario authenticity and appeal, (3) health information-seeking and service access, and (4) recruitment for the subsequent experiment. Groups were audio-taped, and the tapes were transcribed. After two coders achieved inter-coder reliability of > 80%, the transcriptions were theme-coded using NVivo version 2009. A hierarchical (tree node) coding scheme reflected guide items and other themes that emerged from the discussion. Results. There were many areas of agreement between doer and non-doer women, e.g., the opinion that using humor would relieve anxiety about screening. Examples of areas of divergence were: (a) doer women used memory aids for staying on schedule (“I make my mammogram appointment on my birthday”), (b) non-doer women could list few admirable role models, and (c) non-doer women were less likely to call free health information telephone lines.
Learning Areas:
Communication and informatics
Diversity and culture
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Learning Objectives: 1. Explain the positive deviance or "doer-non-doer" segmentation strategy for focus groups with at-risk populations.
2. Compare the screening attitudes, perceived screening barriers, and preferred screening messages and health information channels of African American women who get screened for breast and colorectal cancer on time to those of women who have not been screened on schedule.
3. List strategies used by African American women who are up to date with regard to mammography and colorectal cancer screening to comply with screening recommendations.
Keywords: Cancer Screening, African American
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the principal investigator of the grant funding the research.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|