242212 Gender differences in correlates of smoking among unionized construction workers in California

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Carol B. Cunradi, MPH, PhD , Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA
Sharon Lipperman-Kreda, PhD , Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA
Genevieve M. Ames, PhD , Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA
Background and Objective. Smoking prevalence remains elevated among blue-collar compared to white-collar workers, and construction workers have the highest rate (39%) among blue-collar occupational groups. The study's objective is to identify gender differences in smoking correlates among this traditionally male-dominated occupation so as to better guide smoking prevention and cessation programs to this population. Methods. In cooperation with a large union representing construction workers in Northern California, confidential data were obtained via telephone interview from workers (n=1088; 10% female) who voluntarily participated in a cross-sectional occupational health survey (response rate 53%). A series of gender-specific multivariate logistic regression models were developed to test the association of occupational, demographic, psychosocial, and other substance use correlates to current (past-30 day) smoking. Results. Smoking prevalence (29.8%) didn't differ by gender (chi square = 0.027, 1 df; p=0.87). Among males, being unemployed (OR=1.41; 95% CI=1.02, 1.96), experiencing perceived workplace racial/ethnic discrimination (OR=1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.05), not having completed high school (OR=4.06; 95% CI 1.85, 8.91), impulsivity (OR=1.45; 95% CI 1.21, 1.73), and hazardous drinking (OR=1.08; 95% CI 1.05, 1.11) were positively associated with likelihood of being a smoker; increasing age (OR=0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) and Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.33; 95% CI 0.21, 0.52) were protective. Among females, only adverse childhood experiences (e.g., childhood maltreatment) was significantly associated with likelihood of being a smoker (OR=1.41; 95% CI 1.03, 1.92). Conclusion. Despite having the same prevalence, striking gender differences are seen in correlates of smoking among this sample of unionized construction workers, warranting further investigation.

Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Occupational health and safety
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the session, the participant in this session will be able to: 1. Describe the importance of examining gender differences in the correlates of smoking among construction industry workers. 2. Evaluate findings that show no gender differences in smoking prevalence, but significant differences in correlates of smoking among a sample male and female construction workers. 3. Recognize the need for further research that analyzes gender differences in correlates of smoking among construction industry workers.

Keywords: Smoking, Union

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because one of my areas of resesarch expertise is occupation-based studies of substance use, including gender differences.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.