242319 Promoting shared decision-making in mental health: Findings from an evaluation of a decision support workbook and a computer-based decision aid on antipsychotic medications

Monday, October 31, 2011: 10:30 AM

Laura Elwyn, PhD , Research and Evaluation Center, Advocates for Human Potential, Inc., Albany, NY
John A. Hornik, PhD , Research and Evaluation Center, Advocates for Human Potential, Albany, NY
Laurie Curtis, CPRP , Technical Assistance Center, Advocates for Human Potential, Albany, NY
Darby Penney, MLS , Research and Evaluation Center, Advocates for Human Potential, Albany, NY
Michelle Wagner, BS , Research and Evaluation Center, Advocates for Human Potential, Albany, NY
Shared decision-making is a process in which the expertise of a clinician and the self knowledge, values and priorities of a client are used to collaboratively inform a treatment decision. In the past decade, there has been a growing interest in the promotion of shared decision-making in mental health, consistent with a focus on recovery and person-centered care. However, compared with other areas of health care, there are few decision aids or decision support tools available to people who use mental health services. In order to address this gap, SAMHSA funded a project to develop materials to support and promote shared decision-making in mental health. Two of these products, a decision support workbook and a computer-based decision aid on antipsychotic medications, were field-tested in psychiatric rehabilitation programs in three community mental health agencies, including one serving veterans of the US Armed Forces. More than 100 participants tested each product. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from clients and providers to evaluate (1) the usefulness of each tool, (2) appropriate contexts for the use of each tool, (3) whether each tool supported shared decision-making, and (4) opportunities and barriers related to implementation of the different tools as regular practice in mental health agencies. Although, both products were generally well-received, factors such as program type and client age influenced client and provider response. The presentation will include specific findings and discussion in each of the areas above.

Learning Areas:
Chronic disease management and prevention
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related education

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe components of shared decision-making 2. Define a decision aid 3. List barriers to successful promotion of shared decision-making in a community mental health agency

Keywords: Mental Health Services, Decision-Making

Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Organization/institution whose products or services will be discussed: Presentation describes evaluation of consumer satisfaction of a general decision support workbook and a computer-based decision aid on antipsychotic medications both intended for free public access through the SAMHSA web-site

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the lead evaluator of the SAMHSA funded evaluation of two shared decision-making in mental health decision support products and I am a Senior Research Associate for Advocates for Human Potential, Inc.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.