243171 Program and outcome findings from Pennsylvania's new Cessation Minimum Data Set

Wednesday, November 2, 2011: 1:10 PM

Michelle Henry , Research & Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Jay Mast , Division of Tobacco Prevention and Control, Bureau of Health Promotion and Risk Reduction, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA
Janet Bargh , Division of Statistical Support, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA
Kayshin Chan, MPH , Research & Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Sarah Ingerman , Research & Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Jennifer D. Keith, MPH , Research & Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Kristin Minot, MA , Research & Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Phyllis Zitzer , Division of Tobacco Prevention and Control, Bureau of Health Promotion and Risk Reduction, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA
Background: Cessation is a priority program area with significant resource investment for the Pennsylvania Tobacco Prevention and Control Program. Since 2007, Pennsylvania Regional Primary contractors have collected and reported data on the types of cessation programs provided, number of program participants, and participant quit status. The creation of a standardized cessation minimum dataset (MDS) has increased the utility of cessation data by minimizing variations across regions in indicator wording and data collection protocols (particularly related to follow-up) and ensuring that cessation program and outcome information is comparable across programs statewide.

Discussion: This presentation will describe benefits of a client-level standardized statewide MDS, MDS development, protocol for implementation, and preliminary analysis of 6-months of client cessation data. MDS data will be used to answer program and outcome level questions, including: Who is enrolling in local cessation group and one-on-one cessation classes? Are some tobacco users being missed? Who completes classes and who doesn't? What are the most effective quit methods for various users (e.g., differences based on age, gender, education level)? Who remains quit at follow-up? What type of follow-up yields the best response? For those not successfully quit following participation in the local cessation program, what cessation resources do they access post-program? Are there differences in program “success” (quit attempts and sustained quits) based on the type of tobacco used? Is NRT the common factor in sustained quits? These analyses will help inform programmatic decision making at the local, regional, and statewide levels.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice

Learning Objectives:
Describe how standardized cessation data can be used to inform programmatic decision making, evaluation, reporting, funding, and ultimately ensuring that the needs of the public are met. Identify demographic characteristics of local cessation programming participants and attributes that may influence quit success.

Keywords: Evaluation, Tobacco Control

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been a part of the Statewide Evaluation Team for Pennsylvania's Tobacco Prevention and Control Program since 2005.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.