244266
Adoption of electronic health records by admitting physicians: A heuristic approach
Tuesday, November 1, 2011: 2:50 PM
James Alan Neff, PhD, MPH
,
College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Qi (Harry) Zhang, PhD
,
School of Community and Environmental Health, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Miguel Padilla, PhD
,
Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
Larry Mercer, EdD, FACHE
,
Corporate Offices, Sentara Healthcare, Hampton, VA
Background: Although hospital based electronic health records (EHRs) are generally perceived to improve care, physician resistance may hinder EHR adoption. Purpose: This study uses constructs from diffusion of innovations and resource dependence theories to predict adoption and speed of adoption of an EHR by admitting physicians from three of ten hospitals in a highly integrated health system in Virginia. Functions evaluated: computerized physician order entry (CPOE), electronic history and physical (EH&P) and electronic discharge summary (EDS). The study tested hypotheses that adoption would be associated with: working at larger, academic hospitals; financial alignment; larger physician groups; office EHR; youth; males; medical specialty; high volume; hospital based; high inpatient ratio; and high loyalty. Methods: Administrative data collected for 326 physicians admitting at least ten patients during the six months following EHR activation represented over 80% of the total admissions. Logistic Regression and Cox Regression were used to evaluate how well variables predicted adoption (80% utilization) and adoption speed. Results: The Logistic Regression model predicted significant proportions of variation in adoption of CPOE (66%), EH&P (34%) and EDS (40%). CPOE adoption was more likely (p< .05) for physicians who were male, had a high inpatient ratio, lower patient volume and community hospital setting. EH&P and EDS adoption were more likely for physicians with alignment and large, academic hospital setting. The Cox Regression model predicted significant proportions of variation in speed of adoption of CPOE (10%), EH&P (14%) and EDS (19%). The overall model for CPOE was significant (p=.006); no individual predictors were significant. Physicians who were aligned or worked at the large, academic hospital adopted EH&P and EDS faster. Conclusion: Personal factors: loyalty, age and gender were generally not predictive. Organizational factors: hospital setting and financial alignment were most predictive of adoption. Study results may help administrators improve EHR installations.
Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Communication and informatics
Program planning
Learning Objectives: By the end of the session, the participant will be able to explain the importance of physician adoption of an EHR being installed by a hospital.
By the end of the session, the participant will define factors that predict the adoption and speed of adoption by physicians.
By the end of the session, the participant will differentiate cumulative adoption between three key functions in the EHR.
By the end of the session, the participant will identify areas for future implementation research.
Keywords: Adoption, Health Information Systems
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: It is a summary of my dissertation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|