245239 Integrating maternal, neonatal, and child health and nutrition and family planning: A systematic review

Monday, October 31, 2011

Deborah Brickley, MPH, DrPH , Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Karuna Chibber, DrPH, MHS , University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Alicen Spaulding, MPH , School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Hana Azman, MPH , Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Mary Lou Lindegren, MD, MPH , Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
Caitlin Kennedy, PhD, MPH , Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Gail Kennedy, MPH , Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Milly Kayongo, MD, MPH , Ghb/Oha, USAID, Washington, DC
Maureen Norton, MA, PhD , Office of Population and Reproductive Health, USAID, Washington, DC
Mary Ann Abeyta-Behnke , Office of Population and Reproductive Health, USAID, Washington, DC
The Global Health Initiative emphasizes integrating health programs, but there is limited evidence guiding the integration of maternal, neonatal and child health and nutrition (MNCHN) services with family planning (FP) services. We conducted a systematic review to examine the evidence base for integrating MNCHN and FP services. Cochrane methods were used to search and screen the literature. Inclusion criteria were: 1) peer-reviewed publication through April 2010; 2) pre-post or multi-arm study design; 3) organizational strategy aimed at integrating MNCHN and FP service delivery. Rigor scores were assigned using a 9-point scale. 29 interventions met the inclusion criteria; 7 were randomized trials. The average rigor score was 3.2 out of 9. There was heterogeneity in study objectives and designs, types of interventions, locations, and outcomes. Overall, integration was found to be feasible with many positive outcomes, although many studies reported mixed or no effect on some outcomes. When measured, most studies found an increase in uptake of services, improvement in quality of care, and cost-effectiveness with integrated compared to non-integrated services. Factors promoting successful integration included effective provider training and supervision, providing a large selection of contraceptives, client-centered counseling, involvement of men and traditional health workers, and availability of a clinic with high-quality services. Gaps in the literature include nutrition services integrated with FP, interventions targeting men or couples, and studies measuring long-term effects. Program managers and policy makers should consider integrating MNCHN and FP services when feasible, although more research is needed.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Administration, management, leadership
Program planning
Provision of health care to the public
Public health administration or related administration
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Evaluate findings from various approaches for integrating maternal, neonatal and child health and nutrition services with family planning services. Identify gaps in the literature for integrating maternal, neonatal and child health and nutrition services with family planning services.

Keywords: Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was deeply involved with developing the study's protocol, screening articles for inclusion, reading and extracting data from included articles, analyzing the findings and writing the results.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.