247242 Evaluation of Policy, Systems, and Built Environment Efforts through the use of Community-Based Observations

Monday, October 31, 2011

Zoila Sanchez, MPH Candidate , Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Melissa Henderson, MPH Candidate , Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Rebecca Drummond, MA , Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Maia Ingram, MPH , Deputy Director, Arizona Prevention Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Kevin Koegel, MPH , Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Griselda Martinez , Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Lua Zawacki, MPH , Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Background: The Pima County Communities Putting Prevention to Work (CPPW) initiative seeks to address the environmental and policy factors related to obesity prevention. In some communities with diverse populations such as Pima County, Arizona high levels of disparity exist between ethnic groups. To address health disparities, community partners identified 10-15 geographically distinct areas for intensive efforts based on low socioeconomic status. For baseline and descriptive purposes profiles were developed for each community as a means of assessing how locally driven efforts to bring resources can impact environmental and systems level factors related to nutrition and physical activity. Methods: A neighborhood observation tool was created to capture community attributes including churches, child care, vacant space, food deserts and recreational facilities. The tool also included photo documentation and extensive food vendor and park assessment forms. Pairs of evaluators conducted the assessment by surveying the neighborhood perimeter, conducting interior assessments of food establishments and parks, and driving systematically throughout each street. Results: Written and photographic observations (n=11) were integrated into community profiles, capturing both assets and opportunities for improvement. Overall, communities were rich in recreational facilities; however, many were closed to the public. Food resources were available in most areas, yet nutritional options remain limited. Profiles were shared with intervention teams and neighborhood representatives. Conclusions: Secondary and primary data collection related to the physical activity and nutrition environment at the neighborhood level will aid stakeholders in their decision-making process as they plan for action.

Learning Areas:
Program planning
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Participants will be able to: 1. Describe ways to assess the physical activity and food environment of a specific community. 2. Describe the benefits of capturing community assets and opportunities for improvement through primary and secondary data collection. 3. Discuss how stakeholders can use data to inform decision-making and planning.

Keywords: Evaluation, Community Collaboration

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I actively participated in the development, implementation, and analysis of the observation tool and information.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes

Name of Organization Clinical/Research Area Type of relationship
CDC Communities Putting Prevention to Work Program Grant Funder

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.