In this Section |
248492 Using formative evaluation and QI processes in five unique community programs as they move toward meeting local and cross-site outcomes: Year two findings and lessons learnedMonday, October 31, 2011
The prevalence of Asthma continues to increase despite growing evidence of effective approaches to manage the disease. We describe an evaluation approach for privately funded community childhood asthma interventions to reduce acute episodes, facilitate effective healthcare, foster community and systems level changes and reduce emergency department use for asthma treatment. Our university-based evaluation team was funded to document effectiveness, determine and measure outcomes and facilitate cross-site understanding for programs in five different communities implementing best practice interventions in healthcare and/or agencies. The focus of the evaluation shifted from primarily summative evaluation to formative evaluation and measuring multi-stage outcomes linked through logic models. The logic models helped to clarify immediate, intermediate and long term outcome performance measures while enabling each community to maintain and refine their unique programs designed for each unique community context. This presentation will illustrate how the use of logic models can inform and enhance the quality improvement process by: clarifying the role of evidence based medicine and public health, identifying relevant performance measures for process and outcomes, and using performance data to engage in a Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) model of QI. Presentation will emphasize the lessons learned while employing quality improvement processes to enhance program effectiveness. In addition to lessons learned while using logic models and performance data to improve each program, two years of data on the effectiveness of these asthma projects will be described.
Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programsChronic disease management and prevention Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs Public health or related research Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health Learning Objectives: Keywords: Evaluation, Quality Improvement
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Lead evaluator on multiple cross-site evaluations. Published several evaluation based articles. I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
See more of: Program Evaluation, Quality Improvement, and Performance Management - Posters
See more of: Health Administration |