249090 Trends of Self-Perceived Health Status Among Adults in the United States: 1996 -2008

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Sharmila Chatterjee, MBBS, DNB(I) , School of Public Health and Health Services, Department of Epidemiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Amit Chattopadhyay, PhD, FFPH-RCPUK, MPH, CPH, MDS, BDS, PGDHHM, PGDMLS, DipGlobalEthics, GCertID, GCertPHO, DipJourn, DcFM, MSASMS , Office of the Director, Office of Science Policy and Analysis, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
BACKGROUND: Health status trend data informs healthcare planning and policy development. A recent report suggested a monotonic decline in perceived health status among American adults. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated trends in perceived health status and trends in disparities perceived health status among adults in the US (1996–2007 as available). METHODS: Using the MEPSnet Query tool, data from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 1996-2007 was analyzed. Point estimates and confidence intervals for self-reported health status of adults (18-65 years) were stratified by socio-demographic-economic factors such as sex, race/ethnicity, education, and poverty levels. Trends and differences in proportion between groups were tested using appropriate chi-square tests. RESULTS: Preliminary results show that for all adults, in 1996, 2.8% reported poor health-status (fair: 7.69%) whereas in 2008, 2.59% reported poor status (fair: 8.1%). Proportions of population reporting good or very good health-status also produced similar close values with chi-square tests for trend not being statistically significant (e.g., p=0.62 for very good health-status trend). The only statistically significant trend was seen in report of excellent health (P<0.0001) (1996: 30.69% vs. 2007: 28.17%). However, this overall decline of 2.68 percentage points over an 11-year period was not considered to be meaningful. Similar results were obtained for race, sex and geographical parameters. Over the study period, although fewer whites and blacks reported excellent/very good health status (statistically significant trend, p<0.0001), the absolute changes were too small to be considered a meaningful change (Blacks: 56.56% in 1996 vs. 56.13% in 2007; Whites: 66.33% in 1996 vs. 63.21% in 2007). The racial disparities between in health-status reporting did not change significantly over time (Whites/Blacks in 1996: 66.33%/56.56% vs. 63.21%/56.13% in 2007). Disparities between sexes in health-status reporting did not change significantly over time (e.g. men were more likely to report excellent health status than women - 1996: Prevalence OR (95%CI) = 1.30 (1.18, 1.33) (p<0.0001); 2008: 1.23 (1.11, 1.25) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Population's self-perceived health-status did not show any meaningful change over 11 years. Racial and other disparities in health status remained the same over the study period. This study was supported by NIH.

Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Other professions or practice related to public health
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Describe perceived health status trends Discuss & desceibe trends in disparities of perceived health status Evaluate factors impacting perceived health status Assess changes in racial/ethnic and other within-group disparities in perceived health status.

Keywords: Public Health Research, Ethnic Minorities

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I helped in developing the idea and conducting the analysis
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.