249983 Social Mission of Medical Education: Lessons, Strategies, and Staying Power

Tuesday, November 1, 2011: 12:50 PM

Fitzhugh Mullan, MD , Department of Health Policy/School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Candice P. Chen, MD , Department of Health Policy/School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Jennifer Lee, MD , Department of Health Policy/School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Gretchen Kolsky, MPH, CHES , Department of Health Policy/School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Sarah Diamond , Department of Health Policy/School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Background: In recent years, social mission and social accountability have emerged as increasingly important issues in medical education. In 2010, the presenters published a social mission ranking system for medical schools which generated considerable controversy. The controversy itself has proved instructive, and a review of that controversy will serve as the introduction to the proposed paper. One issue raised in the post-publication discussions focused on what a medical school can do to enhance their levels of social accountability. Purpose: This paper will delineate a series of approaches that can be used to promote the social mission of a medical school and provide a literature review for each. The strategies include cultivation of the pipeline or “supply chain”, admissions policy/strategy, curricular content, location of clinical experiences, tuition/debt management, mentoring/modeling, and post-graduate engagement. Site visits to medical schools that have experience in various strategies will be used to discuss actual experiences with implementation. Implications: Findings will be used to inform health policy and new models of medical education. It will conclude by reviewing the forces that might encourage medical schools to focus more deliberately on these areas of social mission in order to graduate individuals who will address the nation's need for better geographic distribution of physicians, higher numbers of underrepresented minority physicians, and more primary care.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1) Define Social Mission as it pertains to medical education 2) Discuss the authors' social mission ranking system, and the resulting controversy 3) Explain how the social mission ranking publication informed the current study 4) Describe approaches that can be used to promote the social mission of a medical school

Keywords: Workforce, Education

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Murdock Head Professor of Medicine and Health Policy at the George Washington University School of Public Health and a Professor of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine. I have been on faculty at George Washington since 1997 where my research and policy work has focused on US and international health workforce issues with particular emphasis on capacity building in Africa. I graduated cum laude from Harvard University in 1964 with a degree in history and from the University of Chicago Medical School in 1968. I have written widely for both professional and general audiences on medical and health policy topics.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.