252904 Funding Family Planning in Ohio

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Kyle Fluegge, MA , Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics and College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Title X of the Public Health Service Act was created in 1970 such that “no American woman should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition”. The program is the nation's only effort devoted strictly to reducing unintended pregnancy by providing contraceptive services and other reproductive health care services to low-income women. Unfortunately, forty years after its inception, outcomes that it was designed to prevent are continually increasing. In 2006 in Ohio, 190 publicly funded family planning centers provided contraceptive care to 193,400 women, including 59,800 teenagers. Unfortunately, less than half of these planning centers (79/190) received Title X funding support in 2006, thus meeting only 19% of the total need in the state. Additionally, federal funding for family planning programs has been eroding slowly over the past decade. In fiscal year 2008, the program received almost $300 million in funding, which continued the funding decline. The objectives are represented by the following: (1) funding by agency for the period 2008-2009 for all 88 counties of Ohio will be compared with several measures of reproductive health and wellness, including changes in annual county rates of sexually transmitted diseases, reproductive cancers, and prenatal care; (2) I propose a funding formula in order to show how allocation of Title X funding can be implemented with a capitation methodology, using a state-wide needs assessment; and (3) I offer a new method for how an evaluation assessment should be conducted after the initial funding year, using county performance indicators.

Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Program planning
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the relationship between funding levels of family planning at the state level and deleterious outcomes that such funding is intended to reduce and/or eliminate (i.e., cervical cancer, poor birth outcomes from unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases). 2. Demonstrate the effects of change in funding levels for each of Ohio's 88 counties given current need, represented by the proportion of women in each county that are of reproductive age, represent a minority group, and are at less than 250% of the federal poverty line. 3. Identify the second funding formula change, in which funding is adjusted given the performance of each county after the 2011-2012 funding year (i.e., did they meet their benchmarks for year 1 set out in their grant application?) relative to the performance of all counties in Ohio.

Keywords: Family Planning, Funding

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I prepared the funding formula analysis used by Ohio Department of Health during my tenure as an intern.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.