255275 Using maps in advocacy and legislature education efforts

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Jennifer D. Keith, MPH, CPH , Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Maya Gutierrez , Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Joy Blankley Meyer , PACT, Camp Hill, PA
Deborah Brown, MS, CHES , American Lung Association of the Mid-Atlantic, Camp Hill, PA
Nayan Ramirez , Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Kristin O. Minot, MS , Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Background: The Pennsylvania Alliance to Control Tobacco (PACT) and the American Lung Association of the Mid-Atlantic (ALA-MA) provide advocacy workshops for over 100 PA Tobacco Prevention and Control Program contractors/providers each year. The workshops provide an opportunity to build advocacy skills and coordinate key messages that will be delivered across the state. In 2012, advocacy efforts will focus on educating legislators about the importance of implementing comprehensive smoke-free legislation, since the current Clean Indoor Air Act allows for multiple exemptions. PACT and ALA-MA worked with Public Health Management Corporation's Research and Evaluation Group to provide workshop attendees with district level maps depicting location/density of exempt businesses for use as communication tools during advocacy visits with legislators. This presentation will describe how district level maps were created using GIS tools and how maps facilitated discussion about clean indoor air policy. Key Points: 1) Maps provide a consistent way to meet the demand by legislators for district level information. 2) Maps are effective visual aids in coordinated advocacy efforts, but because they require interpretation, should be used with messaging. 3) Geographic boundaries can be updated depending on the political climate to depict relevant areas (e.g., after redistricting, before or after election cycles). Discussion: Maps are a unique communication tool that can be effectively used in advocacy and legislator education efforts. Feedback from local advocates about using district level maps will inform the development of future mapping initiatives to support policy-related work.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Communication and informatics
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe how legislative district maps were created to describe policy impact of a clean indoor air law. 2. Explain how maps were used as communication tools in tobacco control advocacy efforts.

Keywords: Tobacco Control, Advocacy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: of my role as an external evaluator for a statewide tobacco prevention and control program since 2005 and my work with the Pennsylvania Alliance to Control Tobacco on the evaluation of the PA's 2008 Clean Indoor Air Act.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.