258025 Outcomes across residential care settings for children and youth

Monday, October 29, 2012

Sharon Portwood, JD, PhD , Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Suzanne Boyd, MSW, PhD , Department of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
Tamera Murdock, PhD , Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
This collaborative project involved outcomes research across 40 diverse agencies providing foster care, residential group care, and/or residential treatment. During Phase I, data were collected for 838 youth at intake, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Analyses offered insight into the characteristics and mental health needs of children in out-of-home care and illustrate the importance of standardized assessment of children's behavioral and mental health in evaluation and service provision. At the outset, preliminary analyses evidenced a need to conduct separate analyses for subgroups of children based on their level of behavioral/mental health need at intake. Participants were assigned to groups based on clinicians' ratings on the Children's Global Assessment Scale of Functioning; however, multiple measures produced similar results when used to distinguish between need groups. There were few demographic differences between high, borderline, and lower need youth; however, high need youth were more likely to be in state custody and to have had 3+ placements. Moreover, there was a significant increase in the proportion of youth identified as having a mental illness between the lower need and borderline groups and the borderline and high need groups. Analyses of the extent to which need level corresponded with placement level revealed that most lower need youth were placed appropriately; however, only 59.6% of high need youth were in high intensity settings. Over time, functioning improved for those high need youth placed in high intensity settings compared to those receiving less intense services. The implications of these findings for practice and policy will be discussed.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe the characteristics and mental health needs of children and youth in out-of-home placement. Identify effective strategies for examining outcomes for residential care based on children’s level of mental health need. Examine the relationship between children’s level of mental health need and the intensity (level) of the service setting in which they are placed. Discuss the impact of correspondence between need level and placement level on residential care outcomes. Discuss the implications of current research findings for policy and practice related to out-of-home placements for children.

Keywords: Child/Adolescent Mental Health, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conducted extensive research on children’s mental health issues, serving as principal investigator on numerous grant-funded projects. I have provided consulting and training on program implementation and evaluation to a wide variety of agencies and organizations at the federal, state, and local level.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.