259308 Defining sexual relationships in college students: Impact on attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs

Monday, October 29, 2012

Nancy Moore, MPH, CPH , Department: Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Rachel Powell, MPH, CHES, CPH , Department: Health Promotion & Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Jessie A. Barnett, MPH , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Christina Proctor, MPH , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, Project Merits III, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Jessica L. Muilenburg, PhD , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
College students have unique experiences when developing partnerships. Often, defining a relationship can be complicated, and many times, perception of a relationship is different between partners. This is why condom use is so important, particularly with those who tend to be serial monogamists, such as college students. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences in decisions and attitudes depending on relationship type. We surveyed 368 college students at a Southeastern university using an anonymous questionnaire related to sexual behaviors. The majority of the participants were female (75.0%) and white (80.9%). Of those who have had sexual intercourse, students defined their relationships as: in a monogamous relationship (57.2%); not in a monogamous relationship but has a main partner (9.7%); I have sex, but do not have a regular partner (9.7%); I have a few regular partners, but not in a relationships (3.9%); I am not currently having sex (19.5%). Among the different partnerships, there were statistically significant differences between gender (p=0.004), communication comfort (p<0.001), worry in contracting STIs (p<0.001), alcohol usually influencing sex (p<0.001), condom at last encounter (p=0.021), how often condoms are used (p=0.009), frequency of drug (p=0.001) and alcohol use (p=0.010) during sex, and binge drinking (p=0.050). Because college students are at risk for STIs and are less likely to use condoms, programs centered around communication of between partners should be of particular interest to sexual health educators. Further, research should focus on issues of concurrent partnerships and the risks of these relationships for all involved.

Learning Areas:
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:

1. Identify the definitions of sexual partnerships in young adults. 2. Discuss implications for defining sexual intercourse and how interventions need to be tailored to different partnerships.

Keywords: College Students, Sexual Risk Behavior

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: PhD Student on Health Promotion and Behavior. Working with faculty on sexual health programs and surveys.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 3405.0: Sexual Risk Reduction