259534 Hidden histories of internal tobacco industry research

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM

Brianna Rego, PhD , Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
A useful way to investigate the specific ways in which the tobacco men have responded to the health concerns surrounding tobacco is to uncover the history of internal industry Research & Development. This paper will present the extent to which the industry understood the harms of smoking, the extent to which they hid their knowledge of the subject, and the reasons why. By tracing the industry's internal research and responses to particular hazards from the initial studies as early as the 1930s through the mid-1980s, when many research laboratories were shut down or moved overseas amid concerns of litigation, one can construct a historical understanding of the ways in which tobacco manufacturers thought about and responded to health concerns. This paper highlights a cast of characters ranging from research scientists hoping to develop ways to make cigarettes safer to industry managers who dismissed this same research— and public health—in the interest of business. Industry executives made the conscious choice not to act on the results of their own scientific investigations, but it is their customers who had had to live with—and die from—that decision. Knowledge of the industry's longstanding but unpublished research efforts can accelerate tobacco control policy in making cigarettes safer, and the FDA can choose to regulate constituents of tobacco knowing that there have already been decades of research by the industry.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1) Discuss the history of research and development at Philip Morris on issues of smoking and health from 1950 to 1985. 2) Identify the ways in which the industry has kept abreast of external research on smoking and health. 3) List the various research projects the industry has undertaken through the years (such as polonium-210, acetaldehyde, acrolein, nicotine, and carbon monoxide). 4) Explain the results of the industry's studies and the ways in which the industry could have made cigarettes safer but haven't. 5) Demonstrate that current and future tobacco control initiatives, especially under the new FDA regulation can use the decades of research already conducted by the industry to more rapidly implement new policies.

Keywords: Tobacco Industry, Tobacco Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I plan to complete my Ph.D. in the history of science from Stanford University in Spring 2012. My dissertation is a history of R&D at Philip Morris from 1950-1985. I have published on the industry's internal research on radioactive polonium-210 in tobacco in both history journals (Isis, the journal for the HIstory of Science Society) and Scientific American.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.