260152 Effect of SBIRT services provided in hospital emergency departments in Washington State on admission to chemical dependency treatment following screening

Wednesday, October 31, 2012 : 8:30 AM - 8:50 AM

Thomas Wickizer, PhD , Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Sharon Estee, PHD , Research and Data Analysis Division, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA
Melissa Ford Shah, MPP , Research and Data Analysis Division, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA
Lijian He, PHD , Research and Data Analysis Division, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA
Alice Huber, PHD , Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, WA
National survey data indicate that about 12% of the people who need substance abuse (SA) treatment in any given year actually receive it. In an effort to strengthen the capacity of organizations and communities to offer SA prevention and treatment services, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) started the screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) national initiative. Washington State was awarded one of the early SBIRT grants to develop a SBIRT program in 9 hospital emergency departments (ED). As part of a larger evaluation of the Washington SBIRT program, we evaluated the effect of the program on admissions to chemical dependency treatment in the 90-day period following screening. The treatment group (n = 7,097) consisted of 3 groups of welfare clients on Medicaid or a state-sponsored medical program. Using 1 to 1 propensity score matching procedures, we constructed a comparison group consisting of 7,097 clients who did not receive screening. We used multivariable logistic regression techniques to assess the effect of the program on 90-day readmission rates, controlling for demographic factors, treatment need, and health risk factors. Individuals receiving SBIRT services were 2.6 to 3.2 times more likely (p <.01) to be admitted to treatment. The SBIRT effect was greater for clients who had not received treatment during the year prior to screening (OR 3.0 to 3.8, p < .001). Our findings suggest SBIRT programs operating in ED settings can promote timely admission to treatment for individuals with drug or alcohol misuse problems.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice

Learning Objectives:
1) Discuss the goals of the SBIRT program. 2) Describe the findings of the WA State SBIRT evaluation. 3) Discuss the policy implications of SBIRT program effects on treatment.

Keywords: Drug Abuse Treatment, Screening

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have conducted research on multiple topics related to substance abuse over the past 20 years and have made multiple oral presentations at APHA. My research on substance abuse treatment has been published in leading public health journals.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.