260451 Support for a smoke-free multi-unit housing policy among college students

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Vickie D. Krenz, PhD, MSPH , Health Science, California State University, Fresno, Fresno, CA
Melanie Ruvalcaba, MPH , IMPACT Project, American Lung Association in California, Fresno, CA
Susie Rico-Vasquez, BS , IMPACT Program, American Lung Association in California, Fresno, CA
Eric Krenz, PhD , Health Science, California State University, Fresno, Fresno, CA
Exposure of adults to secondhand smoke (SHS) can have immediate adverse effects and can cause coronary heart disease and lung cancer. Data has shown that SHS can drift into accompanying multi-unit housing (MUH) apartments. College students commonly reside in MUH and are targeted by the tobacco industry for initiation of tobacco use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate support for smoke-free MUH for college students. Procedures: A total of 380 participants completed an eight-item survey that assessed demographic information (i.e., age and gender), smoking status, smoking-related illnesses, knowledge of effects of SHS exposure, and support for a tobacco-free policy designating at least 50% of all units of the MUH complexes on campus as smoke-free, including balconies and patios, and designating common indoor areas (e.g., laundry room, hallways, stairways, and lobby) and outdoor areas (e.g., playground, pool area and entryways) as smoke-free. Results: Overall, 311 (81.8%) of the respondents indicated that they supported the policy adoption. Furthermore, 158 (83.6%) respondents who resided in MUH indicated that they would support the policy adoption. The results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between age (χ2 = 6.922, df = 6, p=.328, n=380) in support for the adoption of a tobacco-free policy. However, females were more likely support the policy as compared to males (χ2 = 28.729, df = 4, p=.0001, n=378). Nonsmokers were more likely to support the policy as compared to smokers. (χ2 = 17.991 df = 2, p=.0001, n=380). Findings and recommendations will be discussed.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health or related education
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe the benefits of a smoke-free MUH policy for college students. 2) Understand the negative health consequences of exposure to secondhand smoke. 3) Describe the level of support for a smoke-free MUH policy among college students.

Keywords: College Students, Tobacco Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: program evaluation, preparation of survey instrument, data analysis, and report preparation.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes

Name of Organization Clinical/Research Area Type of relationship
American Lung Association in California Tobacco Control Program evaluation Independent program evaluation consultant

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.