260799 Improvingestimates for electronic health record take up in Ohio: A small area estimation technique

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM

Daniel Weston II, MBA, MS , Government Resource Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Elizabeth Stasny, PhD , Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Timothy Sahr, MPH, MA, ThM, MDiv , Government Resource Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Eloise Kaizar, Phd , Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Much effort health policy research has gone into the examination of strategies to increase health provider quality, efficiency, and patient outcomes. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) position the adoption of EHR as a mechanism of medical costs control and quality improvement meant to compliment the national expansion of health care (Steinbrook, 2009). It is within these policy developments and the desire to improve quality, efficiency, and outcomes that Ohio Medicaid is pursuing the examination of Ohio-based EHR adoption and expansion. As an enticement for greater degrees of EHR adoption, Ohio is implementing the Medicaid Provider Incentive Program (MPIP) to assist practices having financial difficulties or have hesitations in adopting EHR. To determine Ohio's EHR uptake, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and The Ohio Colleges of Medicine, Government Resource Center administered the Electronic Health Records Survey. The goal of this paper is to accurately estimate the Electronic Health Record (EHR) uptake rates for Ohio medical practitioners, primary care physicians, medical specialists, dentists, nurse practitioners, and nurse midwives, with a Medicaid patient volume above 30%, and pediatricians with a Medicaid patient volume above 20%. Two estimation techniques were performed to estimate Ohio's EHR uptake, (1) a Weighted Stratified Sampling Estimator and (2) a Small Area Estimation Estimator. The results of these two estimators will be compared to determine the number of practitioners in Ohio eligible for the MPIP

Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Biostatistics, economics

Learning Objectives:
Compare the results of a weighted stratified sampling estimator and a small area estimation estimator of the Electronic Health Records Survey. Identify the number of practitioners in Ohio eligible for the Medicaid Provider Incentive Program. Identify Ohio’s Electronic Health Records (EHR) uptake.

Keywords: Statistics, Health Information Systems

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have my MBA and almost have completed my MS in Statistics. I was the survey manager for this project and this abstract comes out of the Masters Thesis research. My research interests extend into increasing response rates in physicians, small area estimation, and estimating Electronic Health Records up-take.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.