261581 Experimental Study Using a Virtual Retail Store to Examine the Impact of Point-of-Sale Tobacco Displays and Anti-Smoking Signs on Adult Smokers and Recent Quitters

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Annice E. Kim, PhD, MPH , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
James Nonnemaker, PhD , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Brett R. Loomis, MS , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Asma Baig, MHS , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Edward Hill, BS , Research Consulting, Tarheel Technologies, Durham, NC
John Holloway, BS , Survey Research Division, Digital Technology and Society, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Paul Shafer, MS , Public Health Policy Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lauren Porter, PhD , Bureau of Tobacco Prevention Program, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, FL
Background: Studies suggest that point-of-sale (POS) tobacco ads and displays may act as cues to smoke, stimulate purchases among those not intending to buy cigarettes, and potentially influence relapse among recent quitters. Studies are needed to inform state/local governments' efforts to regulate the time, place, and manner of tobacco advertising under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009. We developed an interactive virtual convenience store to experimentally test the impact of banning POS tobacco displays and posting anti-smoking signs on adult outcomes.

Methods: Adult smokers and recent quitters (N=1,216) were randomized to 1 of 6 virtual store conditions in which the POS tobacco display was either open (status quo), enclosed, (display ban), or enclosed with ads on cabinet (potential unintended consequence of display ban), and anti-smoking ad was either absent or present. Participants completed a shopping task in the virtual store which included the opportunity to purchase tobacco and a survey post exposure.

Results: Compared with adults in the status quo condition, adults in the enclosed display condition with no anti-tobacco sign had a significantly lower urge to smoke (beta= -6.11, p=0.015) and were significantly less likely to try purchasing cigarettes in the virtual store (OR=0.02, 95% CI=0.01-0.06, P<.001).

Conclusions: Banning tobacco product displays may reduce urges to smoke and unplanned purchases. Adding anti-smoking ads did not have an effect on adult outcomes over and above the effect of the display ban.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe how banning tobacco product displays and posting anti-smoking signs at the POS may influence adult smokers and recent quitters.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have lead studies on the influence of tobacco industry marketing for clients such as the New York Tobacco Control Program and Florida Bureau of Tobacco Prevention Program
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.