262163 Designing evaluations for community based participatory research interventions using existing publicly available datasets

Wednesday, October 31, 2012 : 12:30 PM - 12:40 PM

Kristin Hoeft, MPH , Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics; Department of Preventive & Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California- San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Roberto Vargas, MPH , Community Engagement and Health Policy Program, Clinical & Translational Science Institute (CTSI), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Christina Goette, MPH , Community Health Promotion and Prevention Branch, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA
Tracey Patterson, MPH , Southeast Food Access Coalition, San Francisco, CA
Paula Fleisher, MA , Community Engagement & Health Policy Program; UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Kristine Madsen, MD, MPH , Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Margaret Handley, PhD, MPH , Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Local ‘hot spots' of poor health outcomes present a challenge for CBPR and developing evidence-based interventions for specific communities because information allowing population-based characterization of health disparities is often derived from larger national or regional data, and evidence about intervention effectiveness is often developed outside the local setting. As part of a community-university partnership using CBPR to design physical activity and nutrition interventions to decrease obesity in a designated neighborhood in San Francisco, CA, we sought to determine the utility of publicly available datasets to evaluate interventions targeting a specific neighborhood. A review of datasets was conducted using internet search engines, academic literature, and consultation with university and community partners, the Clinical and Translational Science Institute Community Engagement and Health Policy Program which works with local community based organizations, and the San Francisco Department of Public Health. Datasets that included the target neighborhood in its catchment area and measured proximal or distal variables related to obesity outcomes were included. Of 33 databases identified to date, only 12 (36%) had enough granularity to examine neighborhood, zip code, or school- specific levels of the data. Next steps include working with community partners to identify, evaluate and select databases and variables to design an evaluation. As databases become more widely available, participatory methods to identify, evaluate and quantify data sets' usefulness to a particular, geographically focused at-risk population, such as those presented here, will be in increasingly greater demand.

Learning Areas:
Assessment of individual and community needs for health education
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice

Learning Objectives:
1-Describe the importance and challenge of local-level health data 2-Articulate the methods used for identifying and prioritizing publicly-available data for measuring neighborhood health outcomes

Keywords: Community Health Assessment, Methodology

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to be an abstract author on the content I am responsible for because: I have worked with community health programs for seven years, have an MPH degree in Health Behavior & Health Education, and am currently working on a doctoral degree in Epidemiology & Translational science, which focuses on translational science and measurement at the community level.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.