262405 Death Care Sector: Preparedness for Mass Fatalties

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Halley Riley, BA , Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
Robyn R.M. Gershon, DrPH , Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF Philip R . Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
Lori Magda, MA , School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Secaucus
Jacqueline Merrill, RN, MPH, DNSc , School of Nursing and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY
Background: Information regarding the disaster preparedness of critical infrastructures in the United States and elsewhere is limited. In particular, the capacity and response capabilities of the death care sector, which is a key element in the mass fatality management infrastructure in the U.S. is largely unknown. The purpose of our study was fourfold: 1) to increase our knowledge on this issue, 2) to characterize mass fatality preparedness of the death care sector (i.e., funeral industry organizations, representing funeral homes, funeral suppliers, cemeteries, and crematories), 3) to determine the workforce's ability and willingness to report to duty, and 4) to identify factors that served as barriers or facilitators to ability and willingness to report during a hypothetical high fatality pandemic event. Methods: An anonymous, web-based, cross-sectional survey of a national funeral industry sample was conducted. Preparedness was characterized using descriptive statistics. Factors significantly associated with ability and willingness were identified using chi-squared bivariate analysis. Results: Respondents (N=492) generally rated their organizational preparedness planning as suboptimal; only six of 13 preparedness checklist items were typically in place. In contrast, response intentions were uniformly high; more than 80% of respondents were willing to report to work, although high prevalence of secondary obligations might hinder this. Conclusions: Preparedness strategies that address inter-organizational, surge capacity, and personal emergency planning are likely to be most efficacious.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the components of the death care sector within the mass fatality infrastructure. 2. Discuss at least three major functions that the death care sector must be prepared to provide in a mass fatality event. 3. Briefly discuss the major barriers to willingness and ability in the death care sector response

Keywords: Disasters, Death

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have four years experience coordinating funded emergency preparedness and response studies, as well as several scientific conferences, one of which was on the topic above. Working closely with the Principal Investigator, I was responsible for overseeing all aspects of the "Death Care Sector: Preparedness for Mass Fatalities" study, from preparing the funding application to drafting a published, peer-reviewed manuscript and the abstract.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.