264032 Inter-organizational networks in rural smoke-free policy development over time

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 5:10 PM - 5:30 PM

Ganna Kostygina, PhD , Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Ellen J. Hahn, PhD, RN , Tobacco Research and Prevention Program, University of Kentucky College of Nursing and College of Public Health, Lexington, KY
Mary Kay Rayens, PhD , College of Nursing and College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
A wide variety of organizations are involved in promoting smoke-free policies in rural communities. Few studies have examined the structure of the existing systems to improve coordination among these groups. Network analysis was used to assess inter-organizational partnerships related to smoke-free policy development over time in 40 rural Kentucky communities. The study was part of a five-year RCT to test the effects of a tailored, stage-based intervention on community readiness and policy outcomes. A network of 40 community coalitions (22 treatment; 18 control) and 29 individual and organizational partners were assessed through annual key informant telephone interviews over 5 years, 2007-2011. Partnership ties, support ties, and resource sharing ties were examined at two levels: internal community ties to local organizations and external links to state-level agencies. Network density and degree centrality were assessed. Density scores were higher over time for partnership contacts in treatment but not control networks. An increase in average degree centrality was observed in both the treatment and the control group over time. Lead agencies within the networks were identified (e.g., locally, Health Departments and ASAP boards were consistently central; while physicians, faith-based and business organizations played an increasingly central role over time). The intervention may have been effective in strengthening inter-organizational tobacco control networks in rural communities. These findings provide a base for future research that could include structural evaluation of rural tobacco control networks and evidence-based recommendations for developing effective relationships. Longitudinal network analysis can be useful in developing process indicators for rural policy change.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health administration or related administration
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Analyze the structure and strength of inter-organizational partnerships related to smoke-free policy development using social network analysis

Keywords: Tobacco Policy, Network Analysis

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am a postdoctoral scholar with training and expertise in design and evaluation of smoke-free policy promotion programs.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.