264388 Transforming and evaluating approaches to capacity building in local MCAH Programs in a changing environment: That was then but this is now

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 9:30 AM - 9:50 AM

Jennifer Rienks, PhD , Family Health Outcomes Project, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Geraldine Oliva, MD, MPH , Family Health Outcomes Project, University of California San Francisco Dept. Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Katherine Gillespie, MA, MPH , Family Health Outcomes Project, Dept. of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Background: For 20 years, the Family Health Outcomes Project (FHOP) at the University of California, San Francisco has been funded by the California Department of Public Health's Maternal Child and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Program to build local MCAH program capacity for performing community needs assessments, monitoring health, developing action plans and evaluating programs, and to provide data and tools for these activities.

Methods: FHOP historically utilized a 6-pronged capacity building strategy including 1) face-to-face trainings; 2) technical assistance via telephone; 3) on-site consultation; 4) automated analytic tools; 5) written guidelines for analysis and planning; and 6) dissemination of materials and tools through the web and an electronic newsletter. Significant cuts in state and local staffs and budgets, combined with increased access to technology, prompted FHOP to revise its training strategies and develop new products.

Results: Trainings are now done primarily using webinars and are recorded and archived online. Site visits aren't possible, consultations are phone-based, and technical assistance is mostly via email. New products developed to meet changing needs include locally-customizable fact sheets for educating policy makers about MCAH priorities; orientation videos for MCAH directors on the internet; the MCAH Marketplace, a website for sharing resources and products among local programs; and preprogramed data spreadsheets that include all rate calculations with confidence intervals, and graphs that show trends and test for their significance. We have also incorporated the life-course perspective and data on the social determinant of health into our tools and methods.

Conclusions: Budget cuts and shifting priorities require utilizing technological innovations, and adapting training tools and methods over time. Based on its years of experience, FHOP will share lessons learned about the pluses and minuses of various methods and tools for effective and efficient capacity building.

Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Other professions or practice related to public health
Public health administration or related administration

Learning Objectives:
Learning Objectives By the end of the presentation, participants will be able to: -Identify at least two methods for building capacity when there are fewer resources -Discuss strengths and weaknesses of three strategies to build capacity in local MCAH programs -Describe the development of new products in response to changing MCAH program needs

Keywords: Public Health Administration, Professional Training

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I hold a faculty position at the University of California, San Francisco and have been the research coordinator on numerous grants related to maternal and child health and strategies and interventions to improve health. Currently, I am the Associate Director of the Family Health Outcomes Project (FHOP) at UCSF, and have been with FHOP working on research and doing capacity building trainings with California's local Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Programs since 1996.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.