266474 Effectiveness of on-the-ground locating in reducing loss to follow-up in the gulf long-term follow-up study (GuLF STUDY)

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Brian Blackmon, BA , Health Sciences Research, SRA International, Inc., Durham, NC
Steve Ramsey, MPH , Health Sciences Research, SRA International, Inc., Durham, NC
Kathy Rose, PhD , Health Sciences Research, SRA International, Inc., Durham, NC
David Johndrow, MBA , Health Sciences Research, SRA International, Inc., Durham, NC
Matthew Curry, MA , Health Sciences Research, SRA International, Inc., Durham, NC
Richard K. Kwok, PhD , Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC
Dale P. Sandler, PhD , Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC
Background and Objective The GuLF STUDY is a prospective cohort study assessing potential health effects among 55,000 workers and volunteers who cleaned-up the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. A subgroup of 20,000 participants is being selected to complete a home visit within a month of the telephone-based enrollment interview to collect biological samples and clinical measurements. About 20% of participants initially agreeing to a home visit cannot be reached for scheduling. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether on-the-ground locating efforts could reduce loss to follow-up.

Methods Study personnel visited the last known addresses of a sample of 96 participants and attempted to re-establish contact and document reasons for loss to follow-up.

Results We verified that 48 (50%) of these presumably “lost” participants still resided at their last known address. Among those located, 60% agreed to schedule a home visit, 13% asked for more time to consider, and 8% refused the home visit. Unstable phone numbers were common among all those who were located. After multiple visits, the validity of the last known address was not determined for 30% of participants. Only 20% of addresses were invalidated.

Conclusion Our pilot study suggests that many of those initially lost to follow-up can be retained by on-the-ground locating efforts. We will continue this initiative and estimate that we will retain 30% of participants (N=1,200) who would otherwise have been lost to follow-up.

Learning Areas:
Epidemiology
Occupational health and safety

Learning Objectives:
Demonstrate how on-the-ground locating is an effective way of preventing loss to follow-up in studies of workers and volunteers.

Keywords: Vulnerable Populations, Methodology

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been a researcher on federally funded long-term and follow-up epidemiology studies working with hard-to-reach populations of workers and volunteers. I am responsible for the coordination and management of on-the-ground locating efforts for the GuLF STUDY.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.