266825 Nutrition practices and policies in CACFP and non-CACFP child care settings

Monday, October 29, 2012

Sherry Liu, MPH , Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Cheryl Graffagnino, MS, RD, LD , Healthy Children, Healthy Weights, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH
Kendall Leser, BA , Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Carol Smathers, MPH, MS , College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Autumn Trombetta, MS, RD, LD , Healthy Children, Healthy Weights, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH
Phyllis Pirie, PhD , Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
INTRODUCTION: The Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) is a federal program that provides child care settings serving low-income children with subsidies for meals and snacks that meet meal pattern and portion size requirements. CACFP sites also receive annual nutrition education and support. This study compared nutrition practices and policies in CACFP and non-CACFP child care settings. METHODS: A random stratified sample of 350 child care settings (licensed centers, certified family homes) in Columbus, Ohio, was mailed a survey about healthy eating and physical activity practices and policies between May and July 2011. Overall response rate was 74.1% (n=229). Contingency table chi-square tests were used to identify significant differences by CACFP participation. RESULTS: 61.1% of respondents reported CACFP participation. Reported food offerings did not differ by CACFP participation except that CACFP sites were more likely to serve whole grain foods every day (61.2% vs. 49.2%, p=0.026). CACFP sites were also more likely than non-CACFP sites to report that meals are always served family-style (46.0% vs. 30.3%, p=0.033); providers always eat the same foods the children are offered (53.2% vs. 32.1%, p=0.002); posters, books, or pictures about healthy eating or nutrition are displayed (82.9% vs. 69.4%, p=0.019); and that they have at least 5 of 11 written nutrition policies (47.6% vs. 30.7%, p=0.027). DISCUSSION: Food offerings were similar between CACFP and non-CACFP sites; however, CACFP sites exceeded program guidelines in a variety of ways. Regular contact and support from nutritionists may help improve the nutrition environment in child care settings.

Learning Areas:
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the nutrition practices and policies in CACFP and non-CACFP child care settings 2. Identify areas and opportunities for improving the nutrition environment in child care settings and policy change

Keywords: Child Care, Nutrition

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I managed and participated in the survey development, data collection, and data analysis for this project.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.