267022 Impact of the controversy over prostate cancer screening on the participation in a national, free, screening program between 2008 and 2011

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM

Wendy Poage, MHA , Educational Non-Profit, Prostate Conditions Education Council, Centennial, CO
E. David Crawford, MD , Section of Urologic Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
Nelson Stone, MD , Urology and Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Pamona, NY
INTRODUCTION: The controversy on prostate cancer screening has been widely publicized since 2009. We sought to assess the impact of this controversy during Prostate Cancer Awareness Week (PCAW), a national prostate screening program for the years 2008 & 2011. METHODS: Comparing 2008 and 2011 PCAW national data. Demographic, social and health related information was collected via self-reported screening questionnaires. RESULTS: Data comparisons (significant values reported) between 2008 & 2011 show that 1.62% vs. 1.5% were 25-40 years of age; 26.4% vs. 25.3% were 41-55 years of age; 52% vs. 51.8% were 56-70 years of age; and 19.9% vs. 21.1 % were over 71 years of age respectively. Data on reasons for participating in the screenings were reported between 2008 & 2011 respectively as 7.8% vs. 3.2% believed they were at high risk; 24.7% vs. 11.6% due to being health conscious; 27% vs. 11.4% reported they were interested in overall men's health; 41.1% vs. 18.2% wanted to be certain they did not have prostate cancer; and 8.4% vs. 17.9% participated due to family history. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the media coverage on prostate cancer the age of men who participated in the screening events was not significantly impacted. The reasons for men participating has shifted significantly with fewer participating due to a concern of prostate cancer and more due to the family history risk factor. This may be indicative of an impact from media coverage where the need for treatment and disease mortality is often questioned while risk factors are more frequently mentioned.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Other professions or practice related to public health
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related education

Learning Objectives:
Compare prostate cancer screening populations between 2008 and 2011 in light of the publicized prostate cancer screening controvery. Identify important trends in a men's health screening population on prostate cancer.

Keywords: Male Health, Screening

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I serve as the President of the Prostate Conditions Education Council, a national non-profit organization committed to men’s health, which serves as a leading resource for information on prostate health, saving lives through nation wide screenings and awareness efforts for men, the women in their lives, as well as the medical community. My unique expertise includes enhancing knowledge on multidisciplinary approach to healthcare, maximizing patient outcomes by enhancing physician-patient communication, medical research and overall survivorship.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.