268180 Correlates of drugs use and driving among undergraduate college students

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM

Garry Lapidus, PA-C, MPH , Injury Prevention Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Christine Kohn , Injury Prevention Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Hassan Saleheen, MBBS, MPH , 282 Washington St, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Kevin T. Borrup, JD, MPA , Injury Prevention Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Steven C. Rogers, MD , 282 Washington St, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT
Background/Purpose Drugged driving is a problem among undergraduate students. We examined correlates of drugged driving among undergraduate students. Methods An anonymous, confidential, 24-question survey at a large, New England public university during the 2010-2011 academic year administered to undergraduates in courses that met a graduation requirement. Data include demographics, academics, housing status, lifestyle (Greek, athletics, honors), personal values (academics, parties, athletics, religion), high school/college drug use, and driving following alcohol/drug use, or as passenger with alcohol/drug user. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi Square test compared drug and alcohol use immediately preceding driving a vehicle.

Results 444 of 675 completed surveys (66% participation rate). Representative of the student body with a mean age of 19.3 years (range 17-23), 51% male, 75% white, and 8% Hispanic. 78% lived on campus, 92% with driver's license, and 37% car access. 23% drove after alcohol use and 22% drove after drug use. 41% reported having been a passenger with a driver who had been drinking, and 37% with a driver using drugs. Drugged driving was more likely among males vs. females (30% vs. 14%, p<.05), having access to a car (32% vs. 16%, p<.01), living off-campus (34% vs. 20%, p<.05), reporting that parties are important (33% vs. 14%, p<.01), religion is not important (28% vs. 14%, p<.01), best friends used drugs in high school (42% vs. 12%, p<.01) and college (50% vs. 8%, p<.01).

Conclusion The identification of undergraduate sub-groups at-risk for drugged driving will guide the design and implementation of traffic safety activities.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1.Describe the prevalence and correlates of drugged driving among a population of undergraduate college students. 2.List potential drugged driving intervention programs and policy.

Keywords: Drug Use, Motor Vehicles

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal or co-principal of multiple federally funded grants focusing on the epidemiology of injury. Among my scientific interests has been the development of strategies for preventing injury across the lifespan.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.