268253 Electronic prescribing adoption rates: Finds from the National Healthcare Quality & Disparities Reports

Monday, October 29, 2012

Barbara A. Barton, MPH , Social & Scientific Systems\ US AHRQ, Rockville, MD
William Freeman, MPH , Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD
Atlang Mompe , Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
Research Objective: To present finding on Electronic Prescribing System adoption. Background: Health Information Technology (HIT) has the potential to improve several aspects of health care including patient safety to care coordination. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act authorizes incentive payments to providers in an effort to increase rates of HIT adoption. Method: Data on electronic prescribing come from the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports, which compiled information from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Electronic Medical Records Supplement and the American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement. Stratified variables used in the analyses include metropolitan status, geographic region, practice size, physician's age, hospital size, Council of Teaching Hospital (COTH) membership and hospital control. Findings: In 2009, practices with 11+ physicians and in the West were more likely to have computerized systems for ordering prescriptions, sending prescription electronically, and warning of drug interactions or contraindications. Office-based physicians ages 35-44 had the highest percentage of adoption of these HIT functions. In 2008, 40% of hospitals with >400 beds but only 17.5% of hospitals with <100 beds had fully implemented electronic systems for drug decision support. Federal hospitals had a much higher percentage of full implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry systems compared with investor-owned hospitals. Over 72% of members of COTH had fully implemented electronic systems for medication lists compared to 49% of non-COTH hospitals. Conclusion:Small ambulatory practices and small and for-profit hospitals have lower rates of electronic prescribing than larger facilities and federal hospitals. This lag in rates of adoption reflects the expense and major investment required. Young physicians are more likely to adopt electronic prescribing due to greater computer experience. Policies and incentives need to target training to older physicians and demonstrate not only gains in quality and safety but tin efficiency when e-prescribing is adopted.

Learning Areas:
Communication and informatics

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe differences in the e-prescribing adoption rates of ambulatory care facilities and hospitals in the United States. 2. Identify facility and provider characteristics that are associated with low rates of e-prescribing adoption. 3. Discuss types of providers and facilities with the lowest rates of e-prescribing that could benefit from additional incentives and policies.

Keywords: Information Technology, Hospitals

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a member of the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports production team, and have experience in the analysis, summarization, and reporting of Health Information Technology data.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.