269483 Developing a Conceptual Model of Activity-Friendly Rural Environments for Children

Monday, October 29, 2012 : 11:10 AM - 11:30 AM

Erin Hennessy, PhD, MPH , Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Vivica I. Kraak, MS, RD , School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood Victoria, Australia
Raymond Hyatt, PhD , Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
Julia Bloom Herzog, MPH , John Hancock Research Center on Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Obesity Prevention, Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA
Sarah Sliwa, MS, MPH , John Hancock Research Center on Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Obesity Prevention, Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA
Mark Fenton, MS , Transportation, Planning, and Public Health Consultant, Scitutate, MA
Colby Wagoner, MS , Nutrition and Health Services Branch, Kentucky Department of Education, Frankfort, KY
Christina Economos, PhD , John Hancock Research Center on Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Obesity Prevention, Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Boston, MA
Background: Rural children are at greater risk for physical inactivity and obesity than their urban counterparts. The study purpose was to identify the perceived environmental factors in the home, school, and community that support physical activity among rural children.

Methods: A concurrent mixed-methods study involving 99 parent-child (ages 6-11 years) dyads and 17 teachers from four rural communities was conducted in 2007. Qualitative methods included focus group (child only) and PhotoVOICE (parents, teachers) sessions. Quantitative methods included a survey (parent), accelerometry (child), and Geographic Information Systems analysis. All data were merged and results compared. Agreement from all three populations (children, parents, and teachers) provided the highest level of evidence followed by agreement among two populations, and then evidence from each population independently.

Results: Within the home, physical activity opportunities include parenting practices (e.g. logistical support), the presence of siblings, and availability of physical activity equipment. At school, opportunities include age-appropriate recreation equipment, adequate recess and physical education time, policies to support physical activity and physical education programming, and school location. In the community, access to destinations (e.g. living close to town center), park and recreation availability (especially indoor opportunities), and resolution of perceived safety issues (e.g. wild or roaming animals) would enhance children's physical activity in rural settings.

Conclusions: Opportunities for increasing rural children's physical activity exist. More research, interventions, and, evaluations on ways to promote physical activity in diverse rural settings is needed.

Learning Areas:
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Discuss the unique characteristics of diverse rural settings that impact child physical activity opportunities and barriers. 2. Demonstrate a mixed-methods approach to creating a conceptual model of activity-friendly rural environments, including rationale for this approach and methodological issues that arose during data analysis and interpretation. 3. Identify future opportunities, including programs and interventions, to promote physical activity and active living in rural communities.

Keywords: Rural Communities, Physical Activity

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the principal of a federally funded grant, and spent over ten years as a project manager or research assistant implementing community-based studies. For this study that I am presenting, I was responsible for the design, implementation and analysis/interpretation of study findings.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.