269531 Using Communication Theory to Develop an Understanding of Effective EMR Implementation

Wednesday, October 31, 2012 : 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM

Lisa Sparks, PhD , Health and Strategic Comm Dept/Public Health Program, Chapman University/University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
Abstract Background: Federal legislation requires all physicians to adopt and implement electronic medical record systems (EMRs). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service have defined specific criteria and stages of meaningful use that measure the functionality of implemented EMR systems. The transition from traditional medical records keeping to electronic medical records keeping has proven difficult for many physicians; especially in their attempts to meet the criteria defined by the first stage of meaningful use. The aim of this study is to measure and evaluate perceptions of self efficacy and satisfaction in user-based experiences with EMR systems with the hope of shedding light on more efficient methods of facilitating the successful implementation and use of EMR systems. Methods: A convenient sample of Orange County office-based physicians was administered a web based survey. Levels of perceived self-efficacy, capacity, and satisfaction with EMR system use were measured. Statistical analysis of data collected was performed using SPSS. Results: 60% of physicians hadn't reached meaningful use. 32% of responders were unaware of the core objectives for meaningful use stage 1. 82% of respondents recognized no relative advantage to using an EMR system. 64% recognized no perceived usefulness of EMR systems. There were 25 significant interactions, but only 4 correlations were of interest because of their significant interactions with dependent variables associated with the proposed research questions. The most significant correlation was between perceived proficiency and perceived behavioral control (positive correlation/p value= .0001). Discussion: While several correlations proved to be interesting, time constraints inhibited a more extensive evaluation of the study we conducted and has warranted the need for additional research and further data collection.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Clinical medicine applied in public health
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Provision of health care to the public
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Define: Federal legislation requires all physicians to adopt and implement electronic medical record systems (EMRs). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service have defined specific criteria and stages of meaningful use that measure the functionality of implemented EMR systems. 2. Describe how we measure and evaluate perceptions of self efficacy and satisfaction in user-based experiences with EMR systems with the hope of shedding light on more efficient methods of facilitating the successful implementation and use of EMR systems. 3. Demonstrate: Levels of perceived self-efficacy, capacity, and satisfaction with EMR system use were measured. 4: Differentiate: 60% of physicians had not reached meaningful use. 32% of responders were unaware of the core objectives for meaningful use stage 1. 82% of respondents recognized no relative advantage to using an EMR system. 64% recognized no perceived usefulness of EMR systems.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Lisa Sparks (Ph.D., University of Oklahoma, 1998) is Foster and Mary McGaw Endowed Professor in Behavioral Sciences at Chapman University in Orange, California where she serves as Head/Director of the Master of Science graduate program in Health and Strategic Communication in the Schmid College of Science and Technology. Dr. Sparks serves as a Full Member of the Chao Family/NCI Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, Adjunct Professor in Public Health.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.