270125 Teaching oral health in U.S. Family Medicine residency training programs: A national survey

Monday, October 29, 2012

Judith Savageau, MPH , Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
Ronnelle King, MS-IV , Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
Hugh Silk, MD , Hahnemann Family Health Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During the past decade, national initiatives have called for improved oral health (OH) training for physicians. However, how Family Medicine residency programs have answered this call is unknown.

METHODS: 452 Family Medicine residency directors were surveyed about numbers of hours of OH teaching, topics covered, and perceived barriers to this education.

RESULTS: 72% of respondents agreed that OH is an important topic, but only 32% were satisfied with their residents' competency in OH. All but 4% of programs address OH in their curricula; 52% reported 1-2 hours and 45% reported 3+ hours of OH teaching. Most commonly covered were prevention and care of caries (89%) and pediatric screening (85%); less covered topics included fluoride varnish (58%) and pregnancy and oral health (61%). Barriers to OH education included competing priorities (85%), inadequate time (69%), and lack of faculty expertise (52%). Awareness of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine's Smiles for Life (SFL) curriculum and the use of SFL modules were associated with increased hours of training. Training in fluoride varnish, but not the application itself, was associated with more hours of OH curriculum. Residency directors who indicated competing priorities or lack of faculty expertise as barriers reported fewer hours of OH training.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that Family Medicine programs are including more hours than previously, yet continued efforts are needed to cover core OH topics and increase residents' competence. Awareness of STFM's Smiles for Life and use of its modules were associated with increased hours of training.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
1. Participants will be able to describe the importance of assessing and addressing oral health needs of both children and adults in Family Medicine practices. 2. Participants will be able to describe the barriers faced by Family Medicine residency program directors in incorporating oral health education into their existing curricula. 3. Participants will be able to assess the use of the national OH curriculum, Smiles for Life, and its relationship to hours of oral health training in a residency curriculum.

Keywords: Oral Health, Curricula

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have served as a mentor for this student's Senior Scholars project and have conducted the analysis and interpretation of the data along with the study and co-investigator.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.