274776 Nuts and Bolts of Peer Review

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 : 2:30 PM - 2:50 PM

Fungai Chanetsa, PhD, MPH , CSR, Pse, NIH, Bethesda, MD
This presentation will highlight updates in the Peer Review process and the different roles that Program and Peer Review staff play in the grant application process.

Learning Areas:
Other professions or practice related to public health

Learning Objectives:
Describe critical elements in the NIH peer review process, including stumbling blocks to be avoided and specific requirements for an application to be accepted for review.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been a CSR/NIH Scientific Review officer for 7 years focusing on the review of applications in epidemiology and specifically running a study section named Kidney, Nutrition Obesity and Diabetes. I am a designated federal official and required to train reviewers on the policies guiding the Peer Review process and their role in it, as well as outreach to the scientific community about the peer review process.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.

Back to: 4302.0: NIH Grant Review Process