Kirkpatrick model of evaluation to assess public health workforce preparedness training
These preparedness training activities took place between March, 2012 through August, 2012.IPERLC has started to conduct six- and 12-month post-training evaluation and data analysis for a Kirkpatrick Level 3 evaluation on two health departments mini-grantees: Clinton County Health Department (HD), in rural Illinois and Skokie HD in suburban Cook County, Illinois. Also, a Level 4 evaluation will be conducted not only for Clinton and Skokie, but also for mini-grantees Fayette County HD and Winnebago County HD. IPERLC will complete the evaluation and develop a report by September 1, 2013. This presentation will describe the methods of surveying participants and health departments.
Learning Areas:Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Other professions or practice related to public health
Public health or related education
Discuss how the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation has been adapted for the CDC-funded Illinois Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Center training. List at least two types of training evaluations being performed for the IPERLC Mini-Grant Training Projects for local health departments.
Keyword(s): Training, Health Departments
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I served as the evaluator on this project and served as a Co-Investigator on this grant. Among my scientific interests has been the utilization of the Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of training.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.