286215
Challenges of ensuring clean groundwater during unconventional shale gas development: What's the rush
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
: 9:10 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.
Elizabeth Bjerke, JD,
Department of Health Policy and Managment, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Annual shale gas production across the United States has increased twelve-fold since 1990 and currently comprises approximately 23% of the country's natural gas production. By 2035, it is estimated that this percentage will increase to 49%. Globally, Europe, China, Argentina, Mexico and South Africa all have significant, but underdeveloped shale gas deposits. In this country, much of the regulatory burden concerning unconventional shale gas development falls to the states. Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling are technologies recently developed which allow the extraction of gas from impermeable source rock. Legislatures strive to craft laws to comport with good science, but new practices are evolving at a rapid rate and do not always allow for an assessment of risk before industries take action. A team of legal experts at Pitt Public Health, supported by an advisory committee of scientists, government representatives, public health professionals, community advocates, business and industry representatives and other environmental stakeholders, studied the question; Do Pennsylvania laws protect groundwater during unconventional shale gas development? The team identified three scenarios reflecting situations that have contaminated groundwater or that are realistic threats to public health: well casing failure; spills of hydraulic fracturing chemicals near the well site; and, the storage of flowback and production water in open surface impoundments. To assess complex laws in a way that is manageable, objective and replicable, a coding methodology was developed wherein the linguistic data of laws were categorically numbered and analyzed as they pertain to three different purposes: prevention; remediation; and, liability. Pennsylvania's legal requirements were then compared to those in other jurisdictions with abundant Marcellus Shale plays: New York; Ohio; Maryland; and, West Virginia. In doing so, Pitt Public Health identified best practices to prevent groundwater contamination from happening as well as those strategies to mitigate public health concerns after accidents occur.
Learning Areas:
Environmental health sciences
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Learning Objectives:
Assess whether the unconventional shale gas laws in Pennsylvania are adequate to protect groundwater from well casing failure, spills of hydraulic fluid, and leaks of wastewater from surface impoundments from three perspectives: prevention; remediation; and, liability.
Compare unconventional shale gas laws pertaining to the protection of groundwater in all five major Marcellus Shale states: Pennsylvania; Ohio; West Virginia; Maryland; and New York.
Establish best practices to prevent groundwater contamination from happening as well as those strategies to mitigate public health concerns after accidents occur
Keyword(s): Law, Environmental Health Hazards
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Chief Legal Investigator of a research team analyzing laws pertaining to groundwater protection during unconventional shale gas development. The team is comprised of scientists, government representatives, public health professionals, community advocates, business and industry representatives and other environmental stakeholders. The laws were examined from a public health perspective. Additionally, I helped develop a unique methodology to analyze legal text by creating âdataâ of laws by categorical numbering.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.