Patient responses to generalized sexual history questions may not accurately estimate actual risky activities
Objective To determine consistency of patient sexual history survey responses.
Methods Emergency department patients aged 15-34 completed a history of sexual activity in the past year; subsequently analyzed for consistency between general and specific sexual activity questions.
Results (preliminary; will end at 300 each females/males; correlations will be calculated then) Of 395 participants, mean age was 25.1 years, 65.6% were female, and 90.4% reported being sexually active (Sex12). Of 20 males reporting no Sex12, 5% reported providing male oral sex (mOS), 25% provided female OS (fOS), and 20% received fOS. Of 18 females reporting no Sex12, 11.1% reported providing mOS and 11.1% receiving mOS. Of all 117 males reporting no male partners, 1.7% reported providing mOS and receptive anal sex. Of all 230 females reporting no female partners, 0.9% reported providing fOS and 1.7% receiving fOS. Finally, of the 125 males stating they had sex with females (vs. males', both', other'), 4.0% also reported >0 male partners, while 2.9% of 240 females similarly stating only opposite gender sex reported >0 female partners.
Conclusions Preliminary analysis shows that patient responses to general questions regarding sexual activity (e.g. Are you sexually active?) are not necessarily sensitive enough to ascertain infection risk and screening eligibility. More direct questions, likely requiring increased clinician time and comfort, may be required.
Learning Areas:Communication and informatics
Public health or related research
Describe the degree to which general sexual history question responses correlate with more specific reported sexual activities. Describe how general sexual history question insensitivity may impact clinical evaluations.
Keyword(s): Patient Perspective, Sexual Behavior
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have spent 13 years at the state health department laboratory and 6 years since as an academic STD researcher. My MPH and PhD are in public health and I have been funded and published in the area of STD research.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.