Online Program

288840
Impact of mind-body skills on outcomes of stress and anger management educational programs: A rapid evidence assessment (REAL©) of the literature


Tuesday, November 5, 2013 : 3:10 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.

Meghan O'Connell, BS, Military Medical Research Programs, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
Lea Xenakis, MPA, Military Medical Research Programs, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
Jonathon Gooch, BS, Military Medical Research Programs, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
Ashley Price, BS, Military Medical Research Programs, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
Dawn B. Wallerstedt, MSN, CRNP, Military Medical Research Programs, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
PURPOSE: Learning effective coping mechanisms for stress is an integral aspect of building psychological resilience. While many different types of stress and anger management educational programs exist, the specific components that most favorably impact stress and/ or anger outcomes have not been well-characterized. Using the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL©) process, we conducted a systematic review to determine the impact of different types of programs on psychological stress and/or anger outcomes. Of particular interest was if there were differential effects based on four categories of programmatic content (i.e. didactic only, didactic + mind-body skills, didactic + additional modalities, didactic + additional modalities + mind-body skills). METHODS: Randomized Controlled Trials were searched across multiple databases. Inclusion criteria included: (1) in-person educational information provided on psychological stress and/or anger management, (2) mind-body skills (if included) were restricted to breathing, yoga, meditation, p.m.r, guided imagery, or general relaxation techniques, and (3) results reported on: stress, distress, anxiety, tension, coping, PTSD, burnout, anger, social competency, QOL, decision-making, risk-taking, communication, self-efficacy, or resilience. Methodological quality was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 50 criteria for RCT designs. RESULTS: The initial search produced 537 citations, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria. There were 15 didactic-only programs, 18 didactic information + mind-body skills, 2 didactic information + additional modalities programs, and 10 with didactic information + mind-body skills + additional modalities. This presentation will focus on the results of this review, describe the quality of the studies, and characterize which categories of programs had the greatest impact on stress and anger outcomes.

Learning Areas:

Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Advocacy for health and health education
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs

Learning Objectives:
Identify the types of programs that have the greatest impact on stress and anger outcomes Describe the quality of the RCT literature to evaluate stress and/or anger management programs

Keyword(s): Mental Health, Alternative Medicine/Therapies

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the project manager for this Rapid Evidence Assessment (REAL©) of the Literature. Furthermore, I have been a program evaluations coordinator for Department of Defense funded projects investigating resilience education programs for military applications.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.